Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Current Petitions

Methadone Prescriptions (PE789)

Wednesday 27 April 2005 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 6 contributions · 4 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

6 contributions
Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

Petition PE789, by Eric Brown, calls for the Scottish Parliament to take a view on the need for regulation to ensure that methadone prescriptions are taken by the patient while supervised by a suitably qualified medical practitioner.At its meeting on 8 December 2004, the committee agreed to seek the views of the Scottish Executive, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and the British Medical Association. Responses have been received from those bodies and have been circulated to members.

Campbell Martin Ind West of Scotland
link

I remember the petition because the petitioner made a strong case when he spoke to the committee. Because the responses that we have received to the questions that we asked take a different position from Mr Brown's, it may be appropriate for us to return to Mr Brown and ask him to comment on those responses.

Mike Watson Ind Glasgow Cathcart
link

I have nothing substantially different to say. The minister states that the decision whether consumption would be supervised"rests on the prescriber's clinical judgement as to the patient's medical condition".It is difficult for us to gainsay that. However, as Mr Brown said, the question is whether clinicians always make that judgment and a prescription is always given with due consideration to the circumstances in which it is delivered. The general practitioner prescribes the drug, but it is typically delivered at some form of pharmacy. I hope that we can get some reassurance that the GP would know the situation in which an individual was to receive his or her methadone, as that is important. Perhaps we could ask for clarification on that either from the BMA or from the minister, as it seems to be a fundamental issue. If we had an assurance that there is a proper tie-up between the GP and the pharmacist, I would feel easier about the sort of issues that Mr Brown outlined. I also agree that we should ask for Mr Brown's comments on the responses that we have received.

Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

We can do both. We can ask Mr Brown for his views and we can ask the Scottish Executive about the general principle.

Sandra White SNP Glasgow
link

Campbell Martin's suggestion is sensible. I would like to hear Mr Brown's views. I am disappointed with the responses from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the BMA. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society says that supervision can create a secondary dependency and talks about take-home privileges, but the problem is that people are not getting supervision for whole weeks and months. I am disappointed with both those responses, which seem to pay lip service to supervision and do not take it seriously. They call the fact that somebody can take home methadone for a whole week an enhanced service, but I would not call it that. I agree with Campbell Martin that we should seek a response from Mr Brown.

Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

Okay. We will write to Mr Brown and ask the Executive to answer Mike Watson's question for clarification and reassurance. Is that agreed?Members indicated agreement.

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Wednesday 27 April 2005 Petitions · 1
  2. Item in Private Procedure · 15
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 86
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 47
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. New Petitions Petitions · 7
  7. Current Petitions Petitions · 47
  8. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  9. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  10. Current Petitions Petitions · 15
  11. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  14. Current Petitions Petitions · 20

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.