Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Planning (Guidance on Consultation) (PE755)

Tuesday 29 June 2004 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 3 contributions · 2 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

3 contributions
Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

Petition PE755 is from Roger Knox, on behalf of the Ravensheugh Tenants and Residents Association. It calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Executive to review its guidance to local authorities to ensure that adequate public consultation is carried out on planning proposals such as the development of Musselburgh ash lagoons, which is a 400-acre site created as a repository for the ash from Cockenzie power station. In early 2003, East Lothian Council published a detailed plan based on recommendations by a consultancy firm for the development of Musselburgh ash lagoons, which involved a two-month public consultation period. The petitioners are concerned that the council subsequently approved a less detailed revised plan that they claim involved little consultation, gathered more than 100 objections and failed to include an investigation into the environmental impact. In March 2003, the Executive published "Your place, your plan: A White Paper on Public Involvement in Planning", which set out its proposals for strengthening and enhancing public involvement in all stages of the land-use planning system and speeding up the application process. The proposed planning bill is to be introduced in this session, although the Executive has yet to confirm the exact timetable. Do members have any views on the petition?

Linda Fabiani SNP Central Scotland
link

We have had a lot of petitions on the planning process. Because consultations on the planning process are under way and a review of the planning system is being undertaken, I do not think that it would be worth while to do any more at the moment than to refer the petition to the Executive to inform that review.

Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

Do members agree with that recommendation?Members indicated agreement.

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 29 June 2004 (Morning) Petitions · 1
  2. New Petitions Petitions · 33
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 54
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 16
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. New Petitions Petitions · 13
  7. New Petitions Petitions · 15
  8. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  9. Current Petitions Petitions · 25
  10. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  11. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 19
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 13
  14. Proposed Petitions Petitions · 1
  15. Proposed Petitions Petitions · 3

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.