Parliament Workbench
Data: Votes to 12 Nov 2026

Vote · 18 Apr 2012

Project TransmiT

Motion For Debate Motion S4M-02623 Lodged by Fergus Ewing SNP
Carried by 85
100 For 15 Against 0 Abstained 13 Did not vote

Motion text

That the Parliament opposes the current locational charging approach, which levies the highest charges on electricity generators across Scotland, including the areas of the best renewable energy resource, and acts as a barrier to renewable projects that can benefit local communities and contribute to Scottish, UK and EU renewable energy and carbon-reduction targets; continues to support the Scotti…
Read the full motion

That the Parliament opposes the current locational charging approach, which levies the highest charges on electricity generators across Scotland, including the areas of the best renewable energy resource, and acts as a barrier to renewable projects that can benefit local communities and contribute to Scottish, UK and EU renewable energy and carbon-reduction targets; continues to support the Scottish Government’s call for significant change to the existing charging regime, recognising that there remain strong arguments for change to a flat rate of charging for all generators; recognises and supports Project TransmiT, the independent review of transmission charging by Ofgem called for by the Parliament in April 2010; supports a transparent, thorough and effective assessment for improvements in the charging regime; welcomes the emerging outcomes for both renewable and conventional generators on the mainland, which will move away from the current status-quo approach by reducing the scale of the variance in charges currently faced by generators in mainland Scotland; urges Ofgem to deliver effective change quickly; supports calls for Ofgem to deliver a pricing structure that does not penalise the development of renewable energy in the Western Isles, Orkney and Shetland, and further urges Ofgem to recognise that the significant renewable energy resources of these island groups have potential benefits for both Scottish and UK consumers that will be best met by their integration with the wider GB market.

Amendments were lodged but none was agreed, so this vote was on the motion as lodged.

How the parties split

1 MSP voted against their party
PartySplitForAgainstAbst.AbsentMajority
SNP 64 0 0 3 ✓ For united
Lab 28 1 0 8 ✓ For split
Con 0 14 0 1 ✗ Against united
LD 5 0 0 0 ✓ For united
Green 2 0 0 0 ✓ For united
Ind 1 0 0 1 n/a

Party is the MSP's party on the day of the vote. Majority is how most of the party's voting MSPs voted.

Every MSP

128 MSPs

For (100)

Ind 1

Against (15)

Did not vote (13)