Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Current Petitions

Bone Marrow Services (PE1204)

Tuesday 8 September 2009 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 9 contributions · 3 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

9 contributions
Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

PE1204, from Jessie Colson, on behalf of the Richard Colson Severe Aplastic Anemia Fund, calls on Parliament to urge the Government to recognise and promote the life-saving impacts that bone marrow testing and donation can have on people with life-threatening illnesses, and to provide adequate funding to the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service to support bone marrow services and encourage more donors.We have considered PE1204 at length on at least two previous occasions. Do members have any recommendations on how to deal with the petition?

Bill Butler Lab Glasgow Anniesland
link

When we last considered petition PE1204 in May, it was agreed that the Government would meet SNBTS, the Anthony Nolan Trust and the petitioner to discuss the issues. That meeting recently took place.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Committee members should have a note of that meeting, which took place in late August. The note is included as an additional paper. It does not affect the key point on which Bill Butler was about to express a view.

Bill Butler Lab Glasgow Anniesland
link

We could perhaps ask the Government whether timed action points have been agreed. People are looking for a positive response from the Government—a way forward and a timeframe for action. I do not think—unless the clerk is about to advise me differently—that the Government has provided timed action points. Perhaps we could write on that basis.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Do members have other views?

Anne McLaughlin SNP Glasgow
link

I see that the note of the recent meeting states that there will be"a follow up meeting after 12 months to explore how effective the proposed measures have been".Does that count as timed action points, or is that not specific enough?

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

I accept Anne McLaughlin's point, but I think that that could be pulled together with a further explanation of two or three other points that came out of the meeting. I do not think that there is any disagreement on the issue.

Bill Butler Lab Glasgow Anniesland
link

I think that is the timescale for reaching the objective or destination, but it would be helpful to seek clarification about points along the way.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Okay. I thank members for their patience on that.

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 8 September 2009 Petitions · 1
  2. New Petitions Petitions · 1
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 29
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 8
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 10
  6. New Petitions Petitions · 26
  7. New Petitions Petitions · 13
  8. New Petitions Petitions · 11
  9. New Petitions Petitions · 14
  10. Current Petitions Petitions · 14
  11. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  14. Current Petitions Petitions · 14
  15. Current Petitions Petitions · 2
  16. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  17. Current Petitions Petitions · 9
  18. Current Petitions Petitions · 2
  19. Current Petitions Petitions · 2
  20. Current Petitions Petitions · 9
  21. Current Petitions Petitions · 4
  22. Current Petitions Petitions · 4
  23. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  24. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  25. Current Petitions Petitions · 2
  26. Current Petitions Petitions · 7
  27. Current Petitions Petitions · 9
  28. New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 12

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.