PE1087, by Nancy Gardner, calls on the Parliament to consider and debate using underground and, where appropriate, undersea cabling for any new electricity transmission lines, such as that which is proposed between Beauly and Denny. The petition, as well as having been lodged, was hosted on the e-petitions system, where it gathered 232 signatures. The petition is relatively clear. I invite views on how to deal with it. I know that consultation is continuing. In fact, the inquiry into the matter is now on-going.
Official Report · Committee
New Petitions
Electricity Transmission Lines (Underground Cabling) (PE1087)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Frank McAveety Lab 2
- John Farquhar Munro LD 1
- John Wilson SNP 1
- Nigel Don SNP 1
The record
5 contributionsThere is a lot of interest in what is happening and a lot of criticism about what has been proposed. I suppose that we must wait for the results of the public inquiry, which I think is drawing to a conclusion. The local population on the route of the Beauly to Denny line are certainly objecting strongly. All the local authorities, from Highland to Stirling, have also objected. There is a lot to happen yet.
I was going to suggest that we do not wait until the inquiry has reported its findings, as certain issues need to be addressed. This petition might well have raised another—how to transmit the electricity that is produced—on which it would be worth while for the committee to seek the views of the Scottish Government and the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets. After all, the petition might give them an alternative that might not have been considered in the inquiry and that they might think about before they go ahead and put up the pylons and cabling from Beauly to Denny.
A week and a half ago, I attended a conference in Dundee with people involved in establishing sources of renewable energy and in exploring how to transmit across Scotland the electricity produced. All the issues raised in the petition are topmost in the experts' minds, so I do not think that it will tell them anything that they have not thought about already. Of course, that does not stop us writing to the Government or anyone else on what the current position might be.
Are members happy with those recommendations?Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 20 Nov 2007 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 20 November 2007 Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 36
- New Petitions Petitions · 52
- New Petitions Petitions · 7
- New Petitions Petitions · 6
- New Petitions Petitions · 12
- New Petitions Petitions · 5
- New Petitions Petitions · 5
- New Petitions Petitions · 7
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 7
- New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 4
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.