The first current petition is PE497, from James and Pamela McDougall, which calls on the Parliament to urge the Executive, following its consultation exercise of 2000, to introduce legislation at the earliest opportunity to alleviate the nuisance caused by hedges.At its meeting on 25 February 2003, the committee agreed to keep the petition open and to monitor progress of the legislative proposals in the new session. Following recent amendments to standing orders on the procedures for members' bills, Scott Barrie's proposal for a high hedges bill has fallen, along with every other proposal. The clerk to the non-Executive bills unit has advised that Scott Barrie will be required to produce a consultation paper under the new procedures if he wishes to introduce a member's bill.I have been contacted by Scott Barrie, who has told me that he intends to introduce a bill on which he has been working. Do members want to wait to see Scott's proposals?
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Nuisance Hedges (PE497)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Michael McMahon Lab 3
- John Scott Con 2
- Jim Johnston Clerk 2
- Rosie Kane SSP 1
The record
8 contributionsWe have been waiting some time for the bill. It is a long time since Scott Barrie said he intended to introduce it. I hope that he will do so quickly. If he does not, perhaps the Executive should consider addressing the matter in the new planning bill that it intends to introduce. Has a similar bill been passed in England and Wales? Is there room for a Sewel motion here? I, too, have constituents with this problem—it is quite an issue.
I think that there has been such legislation.
I am not sure. I understand that Scott Barrie intends to introduce his bill in the new year. The Executive may be waiting for him to do so before it incorporates the measure into its proposals. That is a matter between Scott Barrie and the Executive.
I understand that the UK Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003 contains provisions on the issue for England and Wales.
Presumably it is not possible to transpose part of the act to Scotland.
That is correct.
Shall we ask Scott Barrie to comment formally on the matter? If he does not, we could ask the Executive whether it intends to do something in this area. Do we agree to contact Scott officially to find out what his plans are and to continue to investigate the issue?Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 8 Dec 2004 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Wednesday 8 December 2004 Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 45
- New Petitions Petitions · 63
- New Petitions Petitions · 38
- New Petitions Petitions · 12
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 44
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 9
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.