Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Current Petitions

Criminal Memoirs (Publication for Profit) (PE504)

Wednesday 26 May 2004 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 8 contributions · 4 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

8 contributions
Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

PE504 is on preventing convicted murderers from selling accounts of their crimes. The petitioners call on the Scottish Parliament to take the necessary steps to prevent convicted murderers or members of their families from profiting from their crimes by selling accounts of their crimes for publication.At its meeting on 4 February, the committee agreed to invite the Scottish Executive to respond to further correspondence that had been provided by the petitioners. The Minister for Justice states:"The Home Office have continued the work on criminal memoirs to which Baroness Scotland referred in her letter of 4 July 2003 to Mr and Mrs Watson and they hope soon to reach a stage where it would be sensible to consult on the issue."The Executive is also of the view that there would be no advantage to be gained in pursuing the matter at a devolved level, as"any Scottish measures could be circumvented by publication in England and Wales."What do members think of that?

Jackie Baillie Lab Dumbarton
link

The sense that something is to happen soon—or that proposals are to be produced for consultation soon—is the first sense of urgency that we have had. The correspondence that has gone backwards and forwards has suggested that it would be some time before proposals would be published. It looks as though something is going to happen sooner rather than later, which is helpful. That is the first positive indication that we have received.I have some sympathy with the minister's view that we need to take a UK-wide approach. It would be self-defeating if something could be published in England and Wales but not in Scotland, as the effect would be the same. With regret, I think that we should wait until Baroness Scotland publishes proposals for consultation. If anything remains outstanding, it is the need to have a sense of the timescale for that.

Campbell Martin SNP West of Scotland
link

Would we be able to firm up what "soon" means? The letter is a bit vague about that. The other issue is the fact that we are told that it would be better to wait for legislation in England and Wales than to do anything in Scotland. There are specific problems with publishing. Something could be published in Ireland, Australia, America or another English-speaking country. I am concerned about waiting if something could be done in Scotland.

Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

I agree with your first point, that we should ask when "soon" will be. I have no problem with that. However, as Jackie Baillie said, the issue is not where the documentation is published; it is where it is allowed to be available. A court recently made the decision to prevent information from being published by national newspapers about the woman from the Soham murder case.

Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

The national newspapers suggested that they might still be able to publish such information in Scotland, as the decision was made in a court in England. That is the kind of difficulty that we might get into. Unless the decision is led by Westminster, we could find ourselves in a difficult situation. We could identify when a decision will be made, but it might be best to wait until we know what Baroness Scotland has to say about keeping things in Britain on a level playing field.

Linda Fabiani SNP Central Scotland
link

I can see the logic of that. The first thing that we need to do is to clarify when "soon" will be. It might also be worth while for us to find out whether the Executive is feeding into the on-going review rather than just sitting back and waiting. There must be differences between Scots law and English and Welsh law that would create anomalies. If those are ironed out as the review progresses, and before the proposals are published, that will stop any further delay.

Michael McMahon Lab The Convener · Hamilton North and Bellshill
link

We can ask about both those matters if we write to the minister. Are members happy to do that?Members indicated agreement.

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Wednesday 26 May 2004 (Morning) Petitions · 1
  2. Interests Procedure · 3
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 32
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 30
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 38
  6. New Petitions Petitions · 3
  7. New Petitions Petitions · 21
  8. New Petitions Petitions · 26
  9. Current Petitions Petitions · 16
  10. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  11. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 7
  14. Current Petitions Petitions · 11
  15. Current Petitions Petitions · 9
  16. Current Petitions Petitions · 8

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.