Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Petitions

Multiple Sclerosis (Respite Homes) (PE572)

Tuesday 14 December 2004 Health Committee Petitions 6 contributions · 3 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

6 contributions
Roseanna Cunningham SNP The Convener · Perth
link

Petition PE572 is on multiple sclerosis and respite homes. We previously agreed to await information from the Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care on current provision in respite care homes. A written response from the commission has been circulated to members and the briefing paper on the petition outlines possible action in paragraphs 11 and 12. Do members have comments?

Kate Maclean Lab Dundee West
link

I am in favour of the suggestions in paragraphs 11 and 12. If I remember correctly, when we discussed respite care we identified that the problem was not the amount of respite places but their appropriateness. For example, young adults might find that their only option for respite care is in a home for frail elderly people. If we agree to take the actions that paragraphs 11 and 12 suggest, we can start trying to get the information that we need about the type of respite places that are available. I am sure that the issue of getting appropriate respite care for adults with disabilities has been raised with every MSP.

David Davidson Con North East Scotland
link

I declare an interest because I am a member of the management group of the Aberdeen respite project.I agree with Kate Maclean that the suggestions in paragraphs 11 and 12 are the appropriate way forward. I would also like the committee to write to the care commission to ask it why—given its fee structure, in which it records the various establishments that it is required to inspect and visit—it does not have details of who has which services? I would like Jacquie Roberts, the chief executive of the commission, to clarify why that is the case.

Roseanna Cunningham SNP The Convener · Perth
link

Are members happy for the committee to pursue both the actions that paragraphs 11 and 12 outline and David Davidson's further suggestion?Members indicated agreement.

Meeting continued in private until 14:57.

  1. Scottish Parliament Health Committee Tuesday 14 December 2004 Committee business · 1
  2. Items in Private Procedure · 1
  3. Subordinate Legislation Subordinate legislation · 1
  4. Petitions Petitions · 1
  5. Petitions Petitions · 15
  6. Petitions Petitions · 9
  7. Petitions Petitions · 6

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.