Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Brownfield Sites (Remediation and Reuse) (PE1943)

Wednesday 26 October 2022 Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee About 11:00 Petitions 5 contributions · 3 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

5 contributions
Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

PE1943, which is on helping to prevent the destruction of greenfield sites by providing financial incentives for the remediation and reuse of brownfield sites, has been lodged by Victoria Mungall and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce financial support mechanisms that would enable local authorities to work alongside developers in bringing brownfield sites back into use, while discouraging developments on greenfield land.

Victoria Mungall tells us that brownfield sites can often be difficult and expensive to remediate due to contamination, unstable ground and other challenges. That results in greenfield sites being targeted for development, as they can be far less expensive for developers to build on. She also highlights that, in England, grants have been introduced that allow local authorities to contribute to the remediation of brownfield land.

In its response, the Scottish Government provides details of the vacant and derelict land investment programme, which was launched in March 2021. That £50 million fund is available on a competitive basis to all Scottish local authorities and to the Clyde Gateway urban regeneration company.

Members might be aware that the draft national planning framework 4 proposes an updated and expanded policy on vacant and derelict land that discourages development on greenfield land, unless no suitable brownfield alternatives are available.

Do members have any thoughts or comments?

David Torrance SNP Kirkcaldy
link

The committee should keep the petition open until the fourth national planning framework is finalised and approved, so that we can see an updated version. We should also write to the Royal Town Planning Institute, Homes for Scotland and the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities to seek their views on the issues raised in the petition.

Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

Are members content with those suggestions? Should we write to any other organisations?

Paul Sweeney Lab Glasgow
link

Vacant and derelict land is a particularly acute issue in Glasgow. I think that the bulk of Scotland’s derelict land is in Glasgow, so it would be interesting to get insights from the Clyde Gateway urban regeneration company, which is the only urban regeneration company left in Scotland, about its work and the model that it has adopted.

It would also be worth while engaging with the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland and the Chartered Institute of Building, which has proposed a demolition levy to promote the reuse and renovation of buildings. A major disincentive has been created through the tax system whereby the renovation and retrofitting of existing buildings is subject to 20 per cent VAT, but demolition and new builds are zero rated, so a handicap is imposed on what should be the right thing to do. That is why you often see otherwise pleasant-looking buildings being destroyed; it does not make any financial sense for the developer to renovate them. There are some perverse incentives out there that should be investigated, because addressing them could be part of the remedy.

Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

I am very happy to accommodate that suggestion. Are members of the committee content to keep the petition open and to write to the organisations suggested ahead of further consideration when we receive responses?

Members indicated agreement.

  1. 09:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 28
  2. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 49
  3. 11:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 8
  4. 11:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  5. 11:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 4
  7. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  8. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 5
  9. 11:15 New Petitions Petitions · 4
  10. 11:15 New Petitions Petitions · 5
  11. 11:15 New Petitions Petitions · 9
  12. 11:15 New Petitions Petitions · 5
  13. 11:15 New Petitions Petitions · 6

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.