Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Water Poverty (PE1793)

Thursday 10 September 2020 Public Petitions Committee About 09:30 Petitions 6 contributions · 5 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

6 contributions
Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 12th meeting in 2020 of the Public Petitions Committee. This meeting is being held virtually.

Agenda item 1 is consideration of new petitions. The first new petition is PE1793, on alleviation of water poverty. The petition, which was lodged by Gordon Walker, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to remove water and sewerage charges from all households in Scotland that are on a low income or on benefits.

The written submission from the Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform explains that water charges are linked to council tax banding, because that

“will frequently reflect ability to pay”,

and allows reductions and exemptions to apply to both council tax and water charges.

The Scottish Parliament information centre briefing and the cabinet secretary’s letter highlight the Scottish Government’s proposals to increase both the discount that is available and the number of households that are eligible when the new charging period begins next year.

It is an interesting petition. In my view, there is often concern when people are told that they do not have to pay council tax but still have a charge for water and sewerage. I do not think that people quite understand the connection between the two. I do not know whether anybody knows the view of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, but the cabinet secretary has provided interesting commentary on the matter.

I invite views from members. I will bring in Maurice Corry first.

Maurice Corry Con West Scotland
link

Thank you, convener. I will pick up on the points that you raised. We should write to COSLA to get its say on the petition. I think that there is an anomaly in the system. When I was a councillor, low-income families and, certainly, people who were unemployed were given the 25 per cent discount on the council tax, but I think that we need to look at the subject in a bit more detail. I ask that COSLA be brought in and asked for its opinions.

Gail Ross SNP Caithness, Sutherland and Ross
link

There is a good explanation in our papers of why water charges are linked to the council tax. As you said, convener, the Scottish Government has consulted on changes for the new period that will start next year, and it plans to increase the discount that is available.

I am happy enough to involve COSLA to see what its opinion is. I agree with that course of action.

Tom Mason Con North East Scotland
link

I, too, agree. It is disappointing that the petitioner has not come back to us with a further submission in response to the Government’s comments. With some of the decisions that the Government has made, it is not clear exactly what it has done, although it is doing something. I would like more information from COSLA. I think that that is the route for us to go down.

David Torrance SNP Kirkcaldy
link

I am happy to go with members’ recommendation that we write COSLA to get its views.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

Thank you for that.

My sense is that members think that there is an issue. Gail Ross is right to say that our papers, including the cabinet secretary’s letter, provide an explanation of how the Government has progressed. I note that it has consulted on the matter, so there is recognition that there is an issue.

I wonder whether COSLA has the view that separating water and sewerage charges from the council tax would create problems for collection. I know that, in the past, some local authorities have objected to the fact that they have had to collect water charges from people from whom they were not collecting council tax.

The committee agrees that we should recognise that there is an issue, but for our own satisfaction we are interested in the views of COSLA on whether what is proposed in the petition is credible or doable, and whether there are issues around that. No member disagrees, so we will write to COSLA about the petition.

  1. 09:30 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  2. 09:30 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  3. 09:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  4. 09:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  5. 10:00 New Petitions Petitions · 7
  6. 10:00 New Petitions Petitions · 7
  7. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  8. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  10. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 10
  11. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  12. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  13. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  14. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.