Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Continued Petitions

Local Authority Complaints Body (PE1659)

Thursday 22 March 2018 Public Petitions Committee About 10:15 Petitions 5 contributions · 4 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

5 contributions
Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

The next petition is PE1659, by Bill Tait, on a local authority complaints body. When the committee considered the petition on 21 September, we agreed to write to a range of stakeholders including the Scottish Government, the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, Citizens Advice Scotland, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives and Senior Managers, and the Scottish Independent Advocacy Alliance. In the responses that we have received, there is no support for the action that is called for in the petition.

Written submissions also responded to concerns that were raised by the petitioner that the SPSO is not effective, as its remit is to do with procedure and not with the facts of cases. Both SOLACE and the SPSO have confirmed that the SPSO does consider disputes about the facts in cases; therefore, what the petitioner seeks already exists.

The petitioner clarified in his written submission that he seeks either the creation of a new body that has a proper remit to replace the SPSO, or a major overhaul of the SPSO to make it fit for purpose. The petitioner remains of the view that there is a postcode lottery with regard to local authority complaints and that there needs to be a set of rules

“of procedure that all councils must follow.”

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?

Angus MacDonald SNP Falkirk East
link

I welcome your clarification with regard to the remit of the SPSO. I think that a lot of people are confused about that. If they are not happy with a decision that is taken by a local authority, they half expect the SPSO to be able to overturn that decision, which is clearly not the case. It seems from its written submission that the Scottish Government is satisfied that the SPSO is operating satisfactorily, so there is basically no support for what the petitioner is asking for. I therefore suggest that the petition be closed.

Rona Mackay SNP Strathkelvin and Bearsden
link

I agree: there is no support for what PE1659 seeks. The EHRC points to a number of views on why it would not be feasible. Equalities legislation is largely reserved to Westminster; the Scottish Parliament would not have the power to introduce the new body that the petitioner suggests. I do not see how the petition can go any further, as it has no support.

10:15

Michelle Ballantyne Con South Scotland
link

From the data and the SPSO’s information on how it has dealt with complaints and the outcomes, there is clearly a process. Some—quite a lot—of the complaints that people make are upheld. There have been a lot of recommendations. There is clearly a system.

Again, such cases are generally very emotive, so it is inevitable that some people will not be, and will never be, satisfied with the outcome. From the evidence that we have in front of us, we can see that there is a system and a process for people to go through. I cannot see any evidence that suggests that we need to consider creating a new body. Unfortunately, this is one of those situations in which we cannot please all of the people all of the time.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

We thank the petitioner for engaging with the committee in flagging up an issue about the way in which public systems take people’s complaints seriously. It is very often a challenge for public organisations. On the basis that there is no support for the action that is called for in PE1659, do members agree to close it?

Members indicated agreement.

  1. 09:00 Decision on Taking Business in Private Procedure · 1
  2. 09:00 New Petition Petitions · 4
  3. 09:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 4
  4. 09:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 5
  5. 09:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 12
  6. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 13
  7. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 9
  8. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 18
  10. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 5
  11. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 5
  12. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 5
  13. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 4
  14. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  15. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 4
  16. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 10

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.