The final new petition is PE1214, from Emiko Okoturo. The petition calls on the Parliament to urge the Government to take all necessary action to remove the requirement that an appellant must require two Scottish counsel to sign the appellant's petition before it can be presented to the appeals committee of the House of Lords, as that is contrary to article 6 of the European convention on human rights. Do members have any suggestions about how the committee should deal with the petition? Perhaps we can invite the Scottish Government to make representations to the UK Government to remove the requirement. That suggestion might be worth pursuing.
Official Report · Committee
New Petitions
Right of Appeal (PE1214)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Frank McAveety Lab 6
- Robin Harper Green 3
- Fergus Cochrane Clerk 2
- John Farquhar Munro LD 1
- John Wilson SNP 1
The record
13 contributionsYes. I suggest something as simple as that.
I am not sure whether that is the feeling of the committee.
I am just expressing my view as convener. I am not guiding members in any way whatsoever.
I am not sure that we should put the Scottish Government in the position that was suggested because the requirement in question is not within the remit of the Scottish Parliament or the Scottish Government and any decision on it must be taken in another place. We should bear it in mind that a consultation was held on the rules for the new supreme court and that the issue in the petition was not brought up in that conversation. If we refer the issue to the Scottish Government, we should recognise that we may simply get the response: "We note the subject of the petition that you have referred to us." That might be all that the Government can do.
Can I ask a heretical question? I might get drummed out of the brownies for this one. The issue might not be within the remit of the Scottish Parliament, but the Secretary of State for Scotland might be able to raise the issue with the UK Government. Are we allowed to write to the secretary of state on the petition?
We would have to seek guidance on that.
There would be nothing to prevent the committee from writing to the Secretary of State for Scotland.
We could draw the issue to his attention. We could say that it was raised in a petition that was presented to the Scottish Parliament's Public Petitions Committee, but that it concerns a matter that is for the UK Government to determine.
Would the committee write directly to the Secretary of State for Scotland, or would it ask the Scottish Government to make representations to him?
I am relaxed about that.
I would be happy if we wrote to both the Secretary of State for Scotland and the Scottish Government to seek their views on the issue. In time, there may be new thinking on the right of appeal referred to in the petition and on how it is dealt with, particularly in the civil courts in Scotland. I suggest that we draw the petition to the attention of the Secretary of State for Scotland and the relevant department in the Scottish Government.
Do we accept that recommendation?Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 2 Dec 2008 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 2 December 2008 Petitions · 1
- Petitions Process Inquiry Petitions · 28
- New Petitions Petitions · 41
- New Petitions Petitions · 42
- New Petitions Petitions · 36
- New Petitions Petitions · 4
- New Petitions Petitions · 13
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 9
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 4
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.