I think that I am back on my reading recovery programme. The next petition is PE1135, from Rob McDowall, which calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Government to review existing guidelines and risk assessment procedures to allow healthy gay and bisexual men to donate blood. Members have in front of them a paper from Craig Wilkie, on behalf of Ross Finnie, which contains some observations on the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service's decision. Ross Finnie contacted me earlier this morning about the issue. We have the papers in front of us.This is a difficult and complicated issue. There are concerns about the effectiveness of blood products and the reasonable rights of individuals to donate blood. We will see where we want to go with the petition.
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Blood Donation (PE1135)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Frank McAveety Lab 4
- Nanette Milne Con 2
- Robin Harper Green 1
The record
7 contributionsI have huge sympathy with the SNBTS. The crucial point is that, necessary though transfusion and donation are, transfusion must be made as safe as is humanly possible. We know that all sorts of people cannot give blood or are not allowed to give blood. For example, if someone has received a transfusion, they are not allowed to give blood any more because of the minute risk of passing on variant CJD. I have huge sympathy with its position, but I am not saying that we should close the petition because questions perhaps need to be asked of the Government.The Equality Network, which represents the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, makes one or two interesting points in the summary to its submission. For example, it states:"The UK blood services should be transparent in their annual review of the donor selection criteria."As knowledge increases, the criteria must vary year on year. It is not obvious that that currently happens. Also, perhaps the questions that are asked of blood donors should be more searching. They are currently fairly superficial, so people can say yea or nay truthfully or not. That issue should be examined.The Equality Network also makes the point that while the existing refusal to accept donors from the gay and bisexual male community continues, the blood services should make clear that they know that the existing criteria will, because they are so superficial and broad brush, exclude many gay and bisexual men who are at low risk of HIV and other infections. That is not currently made clear. If we write to the Government, and perhaps also to the SNBTS, we should point out that these matters should be brought more into the open. I do not see the current situation as discrimination against gay and bisexual men. I see it as a sensible approach to public health safety. However, steps should be taken to make the situation clearer.
Let us see whether we can explore those constructive suggestions.
It is a pity that the pages of the submission are not numbered. The graphs that show the relative probabilities of acquiring HIV from heterosexual and MSM—men who have sex with men—contact show that, between 31 December 2007 and 31 March 2008, heterosexuals were more likely to contract HIV. I should emphasise that that is only the probability of acquiring HIV. Those figures come from the Health Protection Agency Scotland and the Health Protection Agency UK. Therefore, there is definitely a case to answer.
Okay. We will take on board the points that members have raised and explore them with the SNBTS and the Scottish Government.
When we contact the Government, it would be worth asking for its view on the issue with regard to heterosexual males who buy sex. That is a serious point as well.
Okay. Thank you for your patience on that one.
In this meeting
Everything on 4 Nov 2008 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 4 November 2008 Petitions · 1
- Decision on Taking Business in Private Procedure · 1
- Proposed Petition (Admissibility) Petitions · 11
- Petitions Process Inquiry Petitions · 82
- Current Petitions Petitions · 9
- New Petitions Petitions · 10
- New Petitions Petitions · 6
- New Petitions Petitions · 17
- New Petitions Petitions · 13
- New Petitions Petitions · 13
- New Petitions Petitions · 12
- New Petitions Petitions · 8
- New Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 7
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 1
- Work Programme Procedure · 10
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.