PE966, PE990 and PE1041 are mainly to do with community leisure facilities and investment in swimming pools. They have been in the system for a long time: the most recent goes back to this time last year, but one goes as far back as June 2005. We have many papers to consider; the petitioners have been lobbying at various levels, not only here at the Parliament.The Health and Sport Committee is undertaking an inquiry into pathways into sport. I have been involved in the issue, and a key factor is that the range of facilities is uneven throughout Scotland. That can inhibit participation. Another key factor is the statistics on health. Robin Harper has consistently raised the issue of outdoor recreation centres, which he is very keen on.We should refer these three petitions to the Health and Sport Committee, to assist it with its inquiry. However, we could keep them open for our benefit.
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Community Sports Facilities (PE1041)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Frank McAveety Lab 3
- Fergus Cochrane 1
- Nigel Don SNP 1
The record
5 contributionsIf you refer them on, they will pass to the other committee.
Do members agree that the other committee would be the most appropriate one to deal with these petitions?
I do not disagree with that suggestion, but I am reading the last paragraph of a letter from one of the petitioners, which says:"As stated in our previous correspondence we do not believe the Petitions Committee have progressed this petition in the slightest."To those who examine what we do, I want to stress that we do not have any executive power. We can write letters, we can encourage, we can exhort, and we can state our opinion on the record, as we do. However, because we have no executive power, there will be occasions—and this may well be one of them—when nothing much seems to happen in three years. That is not for want of trying. It may be that one or two petitioners do not understand the process and assume that we have magic wands when, in fact, we do not.
There is an opportunity. A major inquiry into a policy area is being undertaken by a committee. Substantive issues that petitioners have raised might be dealt with there.As has rightly been said, some questions thrown up by petitions are to do with local partnerships and commitments on investment. The answers are in the power of others. We are all in this together in Scotland—whether we are MSPs, councillors or petitioners. We have to raise the issue of sport as a tool for improving our country. There is a long way to go. We had brief hope after the Calcutta cup last week, but that hope was dashed again on the grass of Italy. There are highs and lows. That is my modest interpretation of events last Saturday, as opposed to my immodest contribution to 80 minutes of football.
In this meeting
Everything on 18 Mar 2008 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 18 March 2008 Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 53
- New Petitions Petitions · 49
- New Petitions Petitions · 19
- New Petitions Petitions · 14
- New Petitions Petitions · 3
- New Petitions Petitions · 7
- New Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 12
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 9
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 2
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.