The next two petitions relate to institutional child abuse. Petition PE535, by Chris Daly, calls on the Parliament to urge the Government, first, to make an inquiry into past institutional child abuse—in particular for children who were in the care of the state under the supervision of religious orders; and, secondly, to make an unreserved apology for said state bodies and to urge the religious orders to apologise unconditionally. The second petition, PE888, is also by Chris Daly. It calls on the Parliament to urge the Government, in the interests of those who have suffered institutional child abuse, first, to reform the Court of Session rules to allow fast-track court hearings in personal injury cases; secondly, to review the implementation of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973; and, thirdly, to implement the recommendations of the Scottish Law Commission report on the limitation of actions.Members have copies of the written submissions relating to both petitions. Are there any particular views about how to deal with the petitions, which have been in the system for a wee while?
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Institutional Child Abuse (PE535 and PE888)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Frank McAveety Lab 4
- John Farquhar Munro LD 1
- Fergus Cochrane 1
- Nigel Don SNP 1
The record
7 contributionsThe issues have been well debated in the Parliament already.
There is a suggestion that we could possibly close our consideration of the petitions. I ask Fergus Cochrane to keep us right: we can consider closing both petitions, but is one of them more—
The committee can close both, or it could keep one open and close the other. It might make sense to make the same decision in relation to both petitions. To an extent, they go hand in hand.
Okay.
There are many papers—I hope that I can remember this correctly from when I read them—but it seemed to me that the outstanding issue relates to the limitation and prescription periods.The Scottish Law Commission published a report on the matter very recently—in December last year—so I do not think that we should just close the petitions at this point. We should probably write to the Government to ascertain what it intends to do with the SLC report. At that point, we may be in a position to say that we have been through every hoop.
That is not an unreasonable suggestion. Let us see how the Government intends to respond to the report that has been published. Depending on the speed of its response to us, we should be able to deal with both petitions relatively quickly.
In this meeting
Everything on 15 Jan 2008 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 15 January 2008 Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 49
- New Petitions Petitions · 30
- New Petitions Petitions · 79
- New Petitions Petitions · 10
- New Petitions Petitions · 6
- New Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 7
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 20
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 11
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 10
- Current Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 3
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.