Item 2 is current petitions. The petitions that we will discuss were lodged and discussed either before the election or since the current committee was established.The first current petition is PE953, from Ms Jean Gall, on behalf of the Scottish Association of Sleep Apnoea. It calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Executive to increase awareness of the health problems that are associated with obstructive sleep apnoea, to promote proper diagnosis and treatment, and to provide sufficient resources—including resources for adequately funded sleep centres. Members have copies of the written submissions on the petition and other papers that we have had in the past on the issue. Do members have suggestions on how we should deal with the petition? I understand that Scottish intercollegiate guidelines network—or SIGN—guidelines have been produced. Is that sufficient?
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Sleep Apnoea (PE953)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Frank McAveety Lab 3
- Rhoda Grant Lab 1
- Nanette Milne Con 1
- John Wilson SNP 1
The record
6 contributionsI understand that SIGN 73, which covers the matter, is to be updated. If that is the case, we can close the petition and let the matter take its course.
I cannot remember exactly, but the issue was raised with me a considerable time ago by a constituent. I think that it was put to me at that time that there is significant variation between health boards in the way in which the condition is dealt with. I wonder whether we should contact COSLA and ask whether the health boards are implementing the guidelines.
The third paragraph in the response from the Government says:"Responsibility for planning services for those with obstructive sleep apnoea rests with NHS Boards, which are expected to fund them from their general allocations in order to meet the needs of their resident populations."It does not give us any detail of what instructions or guidelines are being issued to the boards or what is happening at a local level. As Nanette Milne said, the difficulty is that, if boards do not treat the illness with the seriousness that it deserves, we could find that—as other petitions that we have received have pointed out—there is great disparity in how the illness is dealt with in different NHS boards. The consequences of its not being dealt with properly could be quite severe for the individuals concerned. It would be useful to tease the matter out slightly and write to the NHS boards or to NHS Scotland to find out what instructions are being provided to the boards and what the boards are doing to alleviate the problems that exist.
That is not an unreasonable suggestion. The fact that the guidelines have been updated addresses one of the issues in the petition, but there is also the issue of the allocation of resources to the different health boards. We can write to the Scottish Government and health boards about the support that boards are given. That will, hopefully, resolve some of the issues that have been raised in the petition. Is that agreed?Members indicated agreement.
Thank you for your patience.
In this meeting
Everything on 18 Dec 2007 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 18 December 2007 Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 62
- New Petitions Petitions · 57
- New Petitions Petitions · 20
- New Petitions Petitions · 5
- New Petitions Petitions · 3
- New Petitions Petitions · 22
- New Petitions Petitions · 4
- New Petitions Petitions · 6
- New Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 11
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 2
- New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 4
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.