Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Community Sports Facilities (PE1041)

Tuesday 18 September 2007 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 41 contributions · 9 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

41 contributions
Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Petition PE1041, by Mr Leslie Trotter, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Executive—now the Scottish Government—to take the necessary steps to ensure that facilities and pitches that are used by community-based sports clubs are of a standard that befits a leading European nation. The petition was lodged before the recent result in the European football championships, so it shows great vision. Mr Trotter is accompanied by John Waddell.Welcome to the committee. You know the format already. I invite you to comment on your petition for the next few minutes and we will then discuss it.

Leslie Trotter
link

Thank you for allowing us to address the committee. John Waddell will read our opening statement—we share the work between us.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

You have the easy part, John.

John Waddell
link

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to support the petition by the unite the clubs campaign. The petition was presented to the Parliament on 14 February after a march through Edinburgh city centre that was attended by more than 3,000 people. The march was organised to highlight the poor condition of the facilities—including pitches and pavilions—that are used by grass-roots, community-based sports clubs.As our forum is based in Edinburgh, we have focused on the lack of good-quality facilities in our capital city. However, we have received much support from clubs throughout the country that have similar tales to tell: changing facilities that have not been developed for more than 40 years; non-existent maintenance; children changing in facilities where there are clear breaches of health and safety; facilities where no regard has been paid to disabled users or female users; pitches where grass is not cut or lined; pitches that are so uneven that a ball rolls from one end to the other without being touched. In many public parks that are used for playing and training, volunteers have to remove dog dirt and more dangerous items such as glass and syringe needles, and many of the dreaded ash pitches are still used week in, week out.We are aware of the national and local strategies to improve sports facilities in general. However, the condition of the facilities that are currently in use has deteriorated over many years. Similar strategies have been in place, but they have failed due to a lack of investment both locally and nationally.In our experience, and in that of thousands of other volunteers, poor-quality facilities have a direct impact on the number of people who take part in sport. Many clubs—such as those represented by the unite the clubs campaign—have to turn away children at a young age or, at best, put them on waiting lists because they do not have the facilities to support the members. It is also our experience that the lack of decent facilities has a direct impact on the number of older children who continue with or take up sport.Our climate clearly does not help to attract young people to sport. However, countries with much worse climates than ours have invested heavily in sports facilities and there are clear benefits to the health and social behaviours of their people. We need to invest now to save in the long term. We ask the Scottish Parliament to acknowledge the important role that community-based sports clubs play at the grass roots in developing the health and well-being of the children, youths and adults of Scotland. We urge the Parliament to raise the profile of sport and to give councils direct and indirect support that allows them to provide facilities to a standard that befits a leading European nation. In that way, we will not let down our citizens and we will move away from being the sick man of Europe.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Les, do you want to add anything?

Leslie Trotter
link

I am happy to answer questions. John and I have a few points that we would like to raise and we will answer any questions that we can.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Thanks very much. You nearly got me nostalgic for clinker ash, diving into boulders and thinking that that was a wonderful Saturday morning.Obviously, the issue has been raised in Parliament in recent years, and major audits have been undertaken, so I am sure that committee members will be keen to explore some issues with you.

Rhoda Grant Lab Highlands and Islands
link

It seems to me that money is available for capital expenditure on sports facilities and pitches from sources such as the lottery. What appears to be the problem is the spending on the maintenance of the sports facilities and pitches. Do you know of revenue streams for that? In your experience, has the council taken on the revenue support, or is it left to communities, which have difficulty in getting funds, to upgrade and maintain the facilities?

John Waddell
link

We believe that it is down to the council, which has the budget to upgrade and maintain the pavilions. However, even council officials have admitted that over the past 25 or 30 years the funding has not been there—it has been used on other things, such as education. The facilities that we use have been neglected. To be blunt, a lick of paint on the outside of the building seems to be the council's way of upgrading something, while inside there is no running water, hot water or heating. The boys and girls are happier to be outside on the pitch than sitting in a damp, cold facility.

Tricia Marwick SNP Central Fife
link

I agree that in past years there has been little or no investment in our sports pitches and facilities. It seems that money will continue to be tight in the next wee while, not least because money that we might have expected through the national lottery will be siphoned off for the Olympic games in London.I know from experience that some organisations want to take over facilities, whether on long leases or through their being given to the community. Could that be encouraged, and would you like it to happen? Could organisations that use the facilities get together and force the council to hand them over if it is not going to make the changes that should be made?

Leslie Trotter
link

That is a great way to work. All sports use the facilities, although I am talking mostly about football; clubs take a great pride in what they do and they can look after the facilities. At Saughton park, two grass pitches are maintained by Tynecastle boys club—or football club, to be politically correct. Those pitches are available virtually every week, whereas those maintained by the council are often off. It is up to the other clubs in Edinburgh—Edinburgh City, Hibs and Preston, for example—to do the same if they want to have and use that type of facility. I think that they are talking about that, and the clubs will take pride in maintaining the facilities.The money comes in from the council, but it does not get to where it is supposed to go. We were up at Sighthill this morning, and there was glass lying on the pitches. The council is trying to improve the facilities but, as John says, a lick of paint does not do it. Regardless of child protection law, which says that the kids cannot use showers, there still have to be showers available, because of dog dirt for example. We cannot stop people and their dogs using the parks—they are public parks—so it is up to the clubs to look after the place. They would take great pride in cleaning up if everything was in place. For example, there is no bucket to put dog dirt in up at Sighthill.Until the clubs started maintenance there was either no water or only cold water. If a kid fell in dog dirt when they were playing football—as has happened many a time—and the mum said, "You're no coming in my car; you've got to clean it off", they would have to use cold water. On a freezing morning, that is no good, so the mother would say to the kid, "Right, you can get the bus home." That is the sort of society that we are living in. Facilities must be in place for those kids. There are too many distractions and outlets nowadays. We all have families. I have a son and a daughter. If the proper facilities do not exist, they will play PlayStation games. People are turning into couch potatoes. We are talking about a health issue, which we feel strongly about. Facilities must be brought up to the right standard.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Some of your concerns result from your experience. Before the recent elections, there was a big demonstration that aimed to raise the profile of the issue.You have raised a matter on which probably every elected member here has received representations from communities. The question now is whether issues can be identified that can push the matter further up the priorities of local and national decision makers so that there will be a strategy that will result in much better quality facilities. A relatively modest contribution may be required in some cases, but in other cases, people may have to start from scratch to provide something that is much more multipurpose. There must be funding debates with local government, sportscotland and Government decision makers.I was the Minister for Culture, Tourism and Sport and therefore know how tight resources are and where people can tap into them. The issue touches on obesity and activity levels. Indeed, that is a good angle by which to try to engage people more effectively in the debate. The problem is tapping into much bigger resources than any individual sports department has and getting other parts of local government and agencies that have more money to say that that money will be put aside with lottery funding and other funds in a partnership programme.Members are keen to explore themes that the petition raises. We can then come up with firm ideas.

Claire Baker Lab Mid Scotland and Fife
link

I want to follow up on the question that Tricia Marwick asked about community-based clubs. What barriers prevent volunteers from running pitches themselves? Are there financial barriers? Child protection legislation was mentioned. Does that legislation present any problems for volunteers who want to take on such a role?

John Waddell
link

I do not think that there are any problems in that respect. Most clubs would be happy to take over the Sighthill pavilion, for example, but the problem that we have noticed is that some pavilions do not come up to a basic standard. We have pushed the council on having a basic standard for our pavilions. Soap, towels, hand-driers and things for females should be available in them, and they should be accessible to disabled people. We told the council that just after the elections, and we are still waiting for feedback. Once we get a basic standard in place, I do not see any problems with handovers to clubs.It should not always be only one club that uses facilities. Les Trotter and I are at Hutchison Vale Football Club, which should not be the only club that has the right to use a pavilion. Perhaps we could share it with Salvesen Boys Club, for example.I do not think that there is any problem with any club running facilities. However, facilities must be at a standard before they are taken over.

Angela Constance SNP Livingston
link

I have a huge amount of sympathy with the petitioners and would like to explore some issues.A few months back, Broxburn United Sports Club took me around some of its facilities. This may sound insincere and glib, but I cannot say strongly enough how appalled I was by some of the changing rooms. They were horrific. I was amazed that, despite those appalling, ghastly facilities—with a changing room like a mud hut—the club had 500 members from the locality. Part of Broxburn United's success lies in the fact that it is a sports club. It is primarily a football club, with soccer schools, girls football and the junior club, but it has also done some joined-up work with the local bowling club. It had a few facilities—for want of a better word—in the community. The club adopted what I think is a Scandinavian model, with a community-led, broad-based sports club. Are you supportive of such a model? Would such an approach help you at all?Broxburn United battled for years and years to get some additional investment, and it was ultimately successful. That was partly thanks to the assistance of sportscotland, but influence was also required with the right people at the local authority. Primarily, it is a local authority issue when it comes to getting hard cash and leadership. However, the Parliament can also do much to help with the direction of travel. It has taken the club seven years to begin to realise its ambitions. It has had some success in getting West Lothian Council to do a bit of fundraising in partnership with sportscotland. That required some strategic decisions in the council, as it considered the sportscotland bid alongside competing demand from the education sector for sports facilities for schools. The council had to take hard decisions, with a refocusing on community facilities.

John Waddell
link

Broxburn United still had to sell off a certain amount of green space to get its facilities—which seems a bit crazy. However, Broxburn United is a good example. Preston Athletic now has its own bit of land, too. Over five to six years, it is now getting its own facilities built, including changing rooms and places to hold meetings. Local people will be able to go along, and they can use baby clubs, toddlers groups and so on. There are excellent facilities at Hallhill in Dunbar for the junior football club and for rugby. They are sustained by power from solar panels and wind turbines. It is a great facility, with Astroturf pitches. Everything is there. We say to the City of Edinburgh Council that, if a small council such as East Lothian Council can provide such facilities, why can the city council not do the same?

Angela Constance SNP Livingston
link

West Lothian Council, a smaller council, has enabled Broxburn United to work towards a £1.5 million project.

John Waddell
link

That is right. Clubs might ask for places to get done up, but we always get knock-backs from the city council, which has been negative.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

Part of the strategy involves raising the debate. I have been involved in local government and at the Executive ministerial end. I know the differences between the people with responsibilities and the people who can find the funding. If there is a keen group of folk at a local level with a couple of supportive opinion formers or decision makers, a strategy can be built up. With a more structured approach, the chances of tapping into the available resources increase. In my constituency, a developing junior team that could well get into the major west-central super league next year has a changing facility for the away team that is, basically, the back of a lorry that is backed on to the stadium. The team is talking to the local housing association, some local decision makers, the national lottery and others. A lot is being asked for, but, for the first time in 10 years, we have got everybody in the same room talking about it. There are two or three good models in Glasgow. For example, Petershill juniors started with a basic stadium and now have major lottery and European money. They were lucky, because their timing was good. There are big national facilities, then there are the moderate regional variations on that and, underneath that level, there are partnerships between local authorities and community clubs. My observation—for what it is worth—is that that arrangement is not consistent enough in the case of Edinburgh. You have raised this debate in order to push the issue forward. We need to get a view from other agencies about whether we are encouraging a structure effectively or are merely talking about such a structure without putting it in place.

Leslie Trotter
link

That is the problem. If it was not for grass-roots, community football, there would be no professional football players—I am talking about football at the moment, but I know that the issue that we have raised concerns sport in a wider sense. Although grass-roots football is important, it does not benefit from the money that goes into the game. The money goes from sportscotland to the premier league clubs. I go along to premier league games and have a season ticket, but I will not do that any more, because I believe that the money has to be structured into the youth levels of all sport—whether it be rugby, hockey, football or whatever—instead of being given to the governing bodies to distribute to the clubs. Schemes such as initiative football take young players for a year and, if they are unsuitable, put them out the door, whereas youth clubs—for girls and boys—keep young players with them for years and help them along in a structured way. Not enough money is coming from the top level to the lower levels. If the Scottish Premier League wanted to give money to the youth clubs, that would solve a lot of problems, as we could look after our own areas. Public parks must be kept public, but clubs could maintain certain areas of them. For instance, the facility at Saughton park could be shared with Tynecastle, Lothian Thistle, Hutchison Vale or Salvesen. Obviously, the schools could use the facility for free during the day—and take advantage of the third generation Astroturf that will be laid down in November—and the venue would still be open to the public.The issue is all about communication and where the money gets directed. We had a meeting with Kenny MacAskill, who said that money might be available through the national health service's drug prevention funding to do up the grass-roots facilities. Fantastic stadiums are not going to happen. We simply want the dilapidated stadiums across Scotland to be brought up to a minimum standard so that they can be maintained by the club—be it a rugby club, a football club, a hockey club or whatever. The clubs must be more involved with the local councils and be able to take pride in the facilities. However, a basic standard has to be achieved first—not just a lick of paint. A decent investment needs to be made. Rather than spending £20 million in 10 years' time to get 30 new pavilions, you should spend £2 million or £3 million now to bring the pavilions up to a decent standard.

Tricia Marwick SNP Central Fife
link

What approaches have you made to the City of Edinburgh Council with regard to the clubs and other organisations taking over responsibility for the pitches and the stadiums? Have you started that dialogue?I suspect that I know the answer to my next question, but have you got any comment on how expensive it is to hire the pitches on a Saturday from the local authority? I know of a youth team in Fife that is struggling to pay the council the money for the use of the pitches. The kids are being asked to stump up a few pounds to play on a Saturday. Laddies who are good players are now being left out because they do not have the money. The organisers feel that they cannot turn round and tell the folk who have paid their two or three quid that they cannot play. Is that situation similar to the experience in Edinburgh?

Leslie Trotter
link

Yes, totally.I think that you have answered the question for us, but one thing that I can say is that we had a meeting with Graham Croucher and Colin Mackay at Meggetland last week on that very issue of how the clubs could work together. Lothian Thistle, Hutchison Vale and Tynecastle would definitely work together, so we could start the process from there. However, clubs all over the country should be involved. It would not matter which clubs shared facilities as long as the funding was put in place.

Robin Harper Green Lothians
link

Am I correct to infer that there are no legally enforceable standards of provision and maintenance for such facilities and no system of inspection?

John Waddell
link

There does not seem to be any system of inspection. I presume that the buildings are owned by the city council, so there must be a statutory duty—if that is the word—to inspect the electrics and water and so on to ensure that everything is functional. However, such inspections never seemed to happen until we started to make a few waves. When we asked what standard of facilities the pavilion should have, we received a reply on a bit of paper that must have been written at 2 o'clock on a Friday afternoon just before people finished. We are still waiting to hear what standard applies.

Leslie Trotter
link

We are asking for nothing more than what should already be in place. We know that vast amounts of money are not available for other facilities. We are asking only that the existing properties—unless they need to be condemned—be brought up to standard and then maintained at that standard. Perhaps the council and the clubs could work together on that to ensure that the buildings are still available in 40 years' time. That is basically it.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

I am conscious of the time, as the committee has a lot on its agenda. I think that we are at the beginning of any course of action. As I said to the previous petitioners, you are free to continue to raise the issue at other levels of decision making by putting pressure on organisations such as local authorities, sports councils and sports governing bodies. However, the committee will now need to reflect on how we should deal with the petition. Do members have recommendations?

Tricia Marwick SNP Central Fife
link

We should definitely submit the petition to the Scottish Government and ask it for its views. In addition, given the other interesting issues that have been thrown up today, we should draw the Government's attention to the Official Report of our meeting as a way of providing more background on the issue than is available from the petition. We should also ask for the views of COSLA.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

As I said, the petitioners have majored on their direct experience of the situation in Edinburgh, but there are variations across the country. In my parliamentary area, although there are still tons of things to do, I can point to two major football development centres—and possibly a third if we are lucky—in addition to one or two other big developments that will take place if the Commonwealth games bid is successful. We already have a lot of sports-type focus in Glasgow. That is partly because, as part of its social strategy 10 years ago, the local authority decided that it needed to get people more active and more involved in sports. I will not kid on that we did not have tons of barneys about the loss of what I considered unimportant sports areas. People of my generation had an emotional attachment to places where they had once played, but latterly some of those places had not really been used. We were able to get through because we had constructive, plausible alternatives to put in place, but other areas might be at a different starting point.We need to try harder to make the situation across local authorities more equal. That is part of the debate that the petitioners will need to have with their local authority and with other agencies. However, the committee can certainly draw people's attention to the issue. To be fair, I know that the department in which I was once minister is aware of the economic time bomb involved, given that we have had 30 or 40 years of piecemeal, rather than systematic, repair and refurbishment. That will be a big call for any Government, but we need to try to consider those issues.I think that one or two other members might have some lateral comments that they want to add.

Nanette Milne Con North East Scotland
link

I suppose that COSLA is the best place to go. We need to get the big picture of what is happening throughout the country, in different local authority areas. It would be interesting to have an overview.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

COSLA was certainly involved in a major audit, along with sportscotland.

Nanette Milne Con North East Scotland
link

We should perhaps contact sportscotland, too, because it must have more detailed knowledge.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

We should also contact Fields in Trust, which is the new name for the National Playing Fields Association. I declare an interest in that I am a member of its board. The organisation has raised issues about planning guidelines in particular. Some local authorities have driven a coach and horses through the guidelines in relation to asset money; they have interpreted the guidelines rather widely. However, Fields in Trust has made progress in its discussions with the Executive come Government over the past five or six months. It would be useful to hear its view, because its remit is broader than that of sportscotland, which is asked to address situations where there is a loss of a sports pitch but not where there is a loss of open ground that was used informally for sports purposes.

Leslie Trotter
link

All those areas will be lost if nothing is done now. We do not know whether the proposed stadium at Sighthill will be built. Five pitches might be lost to make way for a stadium that might not be used for the same purpose. Where will the 500 or 600 kids who are involved in the teams go? They will turn to something else if they cannot play football there, or any other sport, such as hockey; it is not just about football. They will be on the streets and will do what they want. We must look after our kids and get them out playing all kinds of sports. We will not give up until we get what we want. We will march again. I am very passionate about it.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

I appreciate that. Your contribution has raised members' awareness and you have shown your energy and commitment. We will pursue the issues. You will be made aware of the responses that we get. We will decide in the near future how to take forward the petition. If we get the Government and other agencies to respond, we might get a more accurate picture and be able to make stronger recommendations. I am sure that you are aware that there is a cross-party group on sport. Its convener, Margo MacDonald, has engaged with you on your petition. Margo is the shy, retiring type.

Leslie Trotter
link

I know.

Frank McAveety Lab The Convener · Glasgow Shettleston
link

There are opportunities to amplify the issues that you have raised through the cross-party group and by lobbying individual members.

Leslie Trotter
link

We have already done that. We intend to approach all members. Thank you for listening to us.

Meeting suspended.

On resuming—

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 18 September 2007 Petitions · 1
  2. New Petitions Petitions · 1
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 53
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 41
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 19
  6. New Petitions Petitions · 10
  7. New Petitions Petitions · 3
  8. New Petitions Petitions · 3
  9. New Petitions Petitions · 3
  10. New Petitions Petitions · 6
  11. New Petitions Petitions · 9
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 11
  14. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  15. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  16. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  17. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  18. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  19. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  20. Current Petitions Petitions · 11

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.