Petition PE687 is on the donation of bone marrow and blood stem cells. Before proceeding with discussion of the petition, I must inform members—I think that they know, but I say this in case they do not—that, sadly, Millie Forbes, the patient whose search for a bone marrow donor was the catalyst for the petition, died at the end of July. A donor for her was located but, unfortunately, her leukaemia returned. I am sure that we all wish to pass on the committee's condolences to Millie's family when we respond to the petitioner.The petitioner called on Parliament to urge the Executive to run a campaign to encourage the donation of bone marrow and blood stem cells through a bone marrow register, and to recognise and support organisations that recruit bone marrow donors.At its meeting on 28 April 2004, the committee considered a response from the Minister for Health and Community Care and agreed to invite the petitioner's view. The petitioner highlights in her response the need to publicise widely the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service and the Anthony Nolan Trust. The committee has also received a response from the Anthony Nolan Trust that says that the number of donors that are recruited from Scotland—at 2.5 per cent of the United Kingdom total—is woefully inadequate, that a campaign should be run to encourage bone marrow donation and that a long-term strategy to support patients who need transplants should be developed.I would welcome members' views on the responses.
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Bone Marrow Register (PE687)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Michael McMahon Lab 3
- John Farquhar Munro LD 2
- John Scott Con 1
- Mike Watson Lab 1
The record
7 contributionsThe Millie campaign attracted a lot of media and public attention and, as a result, many people took part in the bone marrow banking process, which is to be welcomed. We should do anything we can to improve the situation and to make the public aware that the procedure is a simple one that has tremendous benefits for the recipients of the treatment. As you said, convener, poor Millie received treatment too late, but such treatment has been of great benefit to others. The committee should support the petition in any way possible.
I agree that we should ask the minister to respond to the issues that the petitioners raise. We could also suggest the provision of publicity at blood donation centres and doctors' surgeries throughout the country, with a view to getting more donors.
I agree with those comments. I see Geva Blackett in the public gallery—she has waited a long time for what will be brief consideration of the petition, but we are treating it seriously.I was struck by the figure that 2.5 per cent of volunteers on the register come from Scotland, whereas I recall that the population of Scotland is about 8.5 per cent of the population of the United Kingdom. The percentage of people on the register is well short of that figure. Any action to push it up at least to the UK average would be beneficial.
We must write to the minister and ask for a response. The petition has highlighted inadequacies in the system and we need to find out what the Executive plans to do about that. We run campaigns on a host of issues, and the issue that is raised in the petition seems to be one that requires a lot more attention. A failure to obtain the required number of donors is apparent, so we need to know from the minister why there is no on-going campaign. We must impress upon him why a campaign is needed; there is no harm in letting the minister know that we support the aims of the petition.
The general public seem to be of the opinion that the process of bone marrow transplanting and donation is complicated and drawn out but it is, in fact, a simple procedure that is undertaken quickly at a clinic. A bit more education on that might be helpful.
Do members agree to write to the minister with those comments?Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 29 Sep 2004 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Wednesday 29 September 2004 Petitions · 2
- Interests Procedure · 2
- New Petitions Petitions · 44
- New Petitions Petitions · 34
- New Petitions Petitions · 59
- New Petitions Petitions · 6
- New Petitions Petitions · 13
- Current Petitions Petitions · 86
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 7
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 11
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.