Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Current Petitions

Amateur Boxing (PE594)

Wednesday 3 September 2003 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 8 contributions · 2 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

8 contributions
John Scott Con The Deputy Convener · Ayr
link

PE594, which is about the health and safety of amateur boxers in Scotland, calls on the Parliament to ask the Executive to fund the medical requirements of the AIBA—the international amateur boxing association—to eliminate abuse of amateur boxers in Scotland. The committee's predecessors agreed in February to write to both Amateur Boxing Scotland Ltd and the AIBA to seek their comments on the issues raised in the petition. ABS Ltd strongly refuted the petitioner's claims that amateur boxers are being abused and explained that while all boxers are medically examined by a medical officer prior to a boxing competition, a number of particular examinations that are recommended but are not obligatory are not carried out due to the costs involved.The AIBA explains that although it sets the medical standards that are to be followed by its 200 member organisations worldwide, it is not practical for it to monitor and regulate their application. That is left to the appropriate national boxing organisations. Further comments were sought from the Executive, which has now responded and made clear that it has no intention of providing funding of approximately £534,000 per annum to cover the cost of the non-obligatory tests.The salary of an administrator who monitors boxers' compliance with the obligatory medical requirements is already covered by a grant from sportscotland. The Executive considers that the combination of the carrying out of the obligatory tests, the requirement that protective head gear be worn and the limited length of bouts reduces the risk of serious injury to amateur boxers in Scotland.

Mike Watson Lab Glasgow Cathcart
link

The assurances that have been given by ABS Ltd should be accepted because, as stated in the papers, it has an administrator who is funded by a grant from sportscotland, which takes seriously the issues of safety in any sport. If that person were not doing his or her job effectively, I am sure that sportscotland would have done something about it. Although I understand that safety must be maintained to the highest degree, I believe that the view of ABS Ltd should be accepted and that we should take no further action on the petition.

John Scott Con The Deputy Convener · Ayr
link

From my reading of the papers, a lot of safeguards appear to be in place. Boxing is a dangerous sport and, presumably, people go into it knowing those dangers.

Mike Watson Lab Glasgow Cathcart
link

ABS Ltd points out in its submission that"amateur boxing is 50th on a list of "dangerous" sports and that there have been no fatalities in the sport in Scotland since 1952."That is interesting.

John Scott Con The Deputy Convener · Ayr
link

As a matter of information, was it not the Executive that made that point rather than ABS Ltd?

Mike Watson Lab Glasgow Cathcart
link

The note that I have says that ABS Ltd points that out. It might have come to us via the Executive but it was quoting ABS Ltd.

John Scott Con The Deputy Convener · Ayr
link

If everyone is content, are we agreed that we will take no further action?

Members indicated agreement.

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Wednesday 3 September 2003 (Morning) Petitions · 1
  2. New Petitions Petitions · 1
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 36
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 43
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 4
  6. New Petitions Petitions · 5
  7. New Petitions Petitions · 11
  8. New Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. New Petitions Petitions · 4
  10. New Petitions Petitions · 5
  11. Current Petitions Petitions · 15
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 26
  14. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  15. Current Petitions Petitions · 7
  16. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  17. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  18. Current Petitions Petitions · 11
  19. Current Petitions Petitions · 4
  20. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  21. Inadmissible Petitions Petitions · 6
  22. Inadmissible Petitions Petitions · 6

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.