Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Current Petitions

Radioactive Contamination (PE444)

Wednesday 3 September 2003 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 8 contributions · 4 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

8 contributions
John Scott Con The Deputy Convener · Ayr
link

PE444 is from Mr Allan Berry and concerns radioactive substances in Scottish coastal seawater and marine life. The petitioner calls for the Parliament to investigate the amount of radioactive substances throughout the marine food chain, which he thinks have increased in the past decade. A previous response from the Executive explained that the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, together with the Food Standards Agency, monitors and reports annually on radioactivity in Scottish waters.Members will see from the more recent responses that SEPA and the FSA take the view that a comprehensive and effective regime is in place for monitoring radioactivity in the marine environment and in the marine food chain. They report that the levels of radionuclides that are present do not pose a risk to public health and are in decline.Contrary to the claim in the petition that current reports from Norway show that amounts of radioactive substances there are up to 10 times higher than they were in 1994, SEPA refers to a European Community report that shows a significant reduction in such substances in European surface waters. I am interested in members' views—Interruption. I am not sure what that extraneous noise is—is it from somebody's pager?

Mike Watson Lab Glasgow Cathcart
link

The pager is in Jackie Baillie's handbag.

John Scott Con The Deputy Convener · Ayr
link

I dare not invade the privacy of a lady's handbag to switch it off. The pager will probably go silent in due course. Does anybody have views on the petition?

Linda Fabiani SNP Central Scotland
link

SEPA says that, contrary to the claims in the petition about the situation in Norway, the levels have reduced. I have read the petition closely and read the views of SEPA and the FSA. The committee can take no further action on the petition.

Helen Eadie Lab Dunfermline East
link

That is exactly what I was going to say. I support what Linda Fabiani said.

Mike Watson Lab Glasgow Cathcart
link

We have that statement in writing from SEPA and the FSA.

John Scott Con The Deputy Convener · Ayr
link

The statement is at the bottom of SEPA's letter. The issue comes down to who we believe. As SEPA is the authority involved, we must take its view. Does the committee agree to take no further action?

Members indicated agreement.

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Wednesday 3 September 2003 (Morning) Petitions · 1
  2. New Petitions Petitions · 1
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 36
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 43
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 4
  6. New Petitions Petitions · 5
  7. New Petitions Petitions · 11
  8. New Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. New Petitions Petitions · 4
  10. New Petitions Petitions · 5
  11. Current Petitions Petitions · 15
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 26
  14. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  15. Current Petitions Petitions · 7
  16. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  17. Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  18. Current Petitions Petitions · 11
  19. Current Petitions Petitions · 4
  20. Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  21. Inadmissible Petitions Petitions · 6
  22. Inadmissible Petitions Petitions · 6

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.