PE444 is from Mr Allan Berry and concerns radioactive substances in Scottish coastal seawater and marine life. The petitioner calls for the Parliament to investigate the amount of radioactive substances throughout the marine food chain, which he thinks have increased in the past decade. A previous response from the Executive explained that the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, together with the Food Standards Agency, monitors and reports annually on radioactivity in Scottish waters.Members will see from the more recent responses that SEPA and the FSA take the view that a comprehensive and effective regime is in place for monitoring radioactivity in the marine environment and in the marine food chain. They report that the levels of radionuclides that are present do not pose a risk to public health and are in decline.Contrary to the claim in the petition that current reports from Norway show that amounts of radioactive substances there are up to 10 times higher than they were in 1994, SEPA refers to a European Community report that shows a significant reduction in such substances in European surface waters. I am interested in members' views—Interruption. I am not sure what that extraneous noise is—is it from somebody's pager?
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Radioactive Contamination (PE444)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- John Scott Con 3
- Mike Watson Lab 2
- Linda Fabiani SNP 1
- Helen Eadie Lab 1
The record
8 contributionsThe pager is in Jackie Baillie's handbag.
I dare not invade the privacy of a lady's handbag to switch it off. The pager will probably go silent in due course. Does anybody have views on the petition?
SEPA says that, contrary to the claims in the petition about the situation in Norway, the levels have reduced. I have read the petition closely and read the views of SEPA and the FSA. The committee can take no further action on the petition.
That is exactly what I was going to say. I support what Linda Fabiani said.
We have that statement in writing from SEPA and the FSA.
The statement is at the bottom of SEPA's letter. The issue comes down to who we believe. As SEPA is the authority involved, we must take its view. Does the committee agree to take no further action?
Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 3 Sep 2003 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Wednesday 3 September 2003 (Morning) Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 36
- New Petitions Petitions · 43
- New Petitions Petitions · 4
- New Petitions Petitions · 5
- New Petitions Petitions · 11
- New Petitions Petitions · 6
- New Petitions Petitions · 4
- New Petitions Petitions · 5
- Current Petitions Petitions · 15
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 26
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 7
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 8
- Current Petitions Petitions · 11
- Current Petitions Petitions · 4
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Inadmissible Petitions Petitions · 6
- Inadmissible Petitions Petitions · 6
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.