Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Current Petitions

Radioactive Contamination (PE444)

Tuesday 25 March 2003 Public Petitions Committee Petitions 5 contributions · 3 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

5 contributions
John McAllion Lab The Convener · Dundee East
link

The next petition is PE444, from Mr Alan Berry, on the subject of the quantity of radioactive substance in Scottish coastal seawater and marine life.We agreed to seek the views of the Executive and the North Atlantic Fisheries College. We have received a response from the Executive only recently, but have not yet received one from the college. The Executive suggests that we approach the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and the Food Standards Agency Scotland for further information on the monitoring research that is being conducted in this field. I suggest that we do so and that we ask SEPA and the FSA to address the petitioner's concerns.I also suggest that we continue to pursue a response from the North Atlantic Fisheries College and that we extend an apology to the petitioner for the lengthy time that it has taken to progress the petition. I further suggest that we send a copy of the Executive response to the clerk to the Transport and the Environment Committee for information only.

Dr Winnie Ewing SNP Highlands and Islands
link

There is a case before the Court of Session about radioactive substances on the beach beside Dounreay.

John McAllion Lab The Convener · Dundee East
link

Petition PE444 will continue to be an active petition in the next session of Parliament.

Phil Gallie Con South of Scotland
link

Given that the clerk has chased up PE444, it seems that if we give an apology, we will be apologising to an extent on behalf of others. Few petitions have run for as long as this one, or for as long without a reply being received from the Executive.

John McAllion Lab The Convener · Dundee East
link

We are not apologising for anything that the clerks have done. The clerks have always done an excellent job. We are apologising because of the problem that arises when the people to whom we write—in this case the Executive—do not respond. We are making an apology for the time that it has taken to get a response out of the Executive. Is the suggested approach agreed?Members indicated agreement.

  1. Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 25 March 2003 (Morning) Petitions · 2
  2. Item in Private Procedure · 13
  3. New Petitions Petitions · 70
  4. New Petitions Petitions · 25
  5. New Petitions Petitions · 22
  6. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  7. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  8. Current Petitions Petitions · 40
  9. Current Petitions Petitions · 7
  10. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  11. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  12. Current Petitions Petitions · 10
  13. Current Petitions Petitions · 19
  14. Current Petitions Petitions · 4
  15. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  16. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  17. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  18. Current Petitions Petitions · 25
  19. Current Petitions Petitions · 2
  20. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  21. Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  22. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  23. Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  24. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  25. Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  26. Current Petitions Petitions · 17
  27. Convener's Report Procedure · 21

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.