We are nearly there.PE492, which is from Mr Duncan Shields, calls on the Parliament to take the necessary steps to set up and monitor a national register of children who are permanently alienated from a parent. We considered the petition in May but agreed to defer our consideration of it until we had received responses to PE413, PE438 and PE465, which are the other petitions that we have received on parental alienation syndrome. The responses that we have to date received on those petitions are detailed in members' papers.When the committee considered PE413, we noted the Executive's view that the judiciary is well aware, and takes account, of behavioural issues that might be attributed to parental alienation syndrome when it reaches decisions in cases that involve children. We took that into account and agreed to take no further action in relation to PE413.In our consideration of PE492, members will wish to consider whether the actions that are proposed by the petitioner would be appropriate. It is suggested that the introduction of a private register of alienated children would be both difficult and, more important, inappropriate for obvious legal reasons, such as the protection of children's identities.The petitioner's other proposal—to create a public register that details legal firms and sheriffs who are involved in any legal action or decisions that cause or contribute to alienation from a parent—would also seem to be inappropriate. If each case is to be judged on its merits, a register of judges and sheriffs and their decisions would compromise subsequent decisions.On the basis of those two arguments, it was suggested that we take no further action in relation to the petition.
Official Report · Committee
Current Petitions
Separated Children (National Register) (PE492)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- John McAllion Lab 2
- Dr Winnie Ewing SNP 1
The record
3 contributionsI have discussed the matter with several sheriffs. It is normal practice for those who are appointed as sheriffs to be sent to a different part of Scotland. Under the shrieval code of conduct, a sheriff should not sit in a case of the sort that is detailed in the petition. We should take no further action on the petition.
Is that agreed?Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 10 Sep 2002 →- Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee Tuesday 10 September 2002 (Morning) Petitions · 2
- New Petitions Petitions · 1
- New Petitions Petitions · 10
- New Petitions Petitions · 33
- New Petitions Petitions · 52
- New Petitions Petitions · 55
- New Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 158
- Current Petitions Petitions · 11
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 7
- Current Petitions Petitions · 6
- Current Petitions Petitions · 13
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 1
- Current Petitions Petitions · 3
- Current Petitions Petitions · 7
- Current Petitions Petitions · 13
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.