Agenda item 2 is consideration of petition PE361, from Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers. I assume that members have had sight of the petition. We have two alternatives. We could simply close our consideration of the petition, or we could confirm to the petitioners that, as they know, we are conducting an inquiry into the regulation of the legal profession and their position and comments will be taken into account. The latter option is perhaps better. Do members agree that that would be the better approach?
Official Report · Committee
Petition
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Gordon Jackson Lab 1
The record
3 contributionsScotland Against Crooked Lawyers (PE361)
Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 23 Oct 2001 →- Scottish Parliament Justice 1 Committee Tuesday 23 October 2001 (Afternoon) Committee business · 1
- Item in Private Procedure · 2
- Petition Petitions · 3
- Subordinate Legislation Subordinate legislation · 17
- Fur Farming (Prohibition) (Scotland) Bill Bill debate · 9
- Prisons Committee business · 185
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.