Our next item of business is consideration of petitions. I refer members to briefing papers 4 and 5.PE789, by Eric Brown, calls for the Parliament to take a view on regulation to ensure that the patient takes methadone prescriptions while supervised by a suitably qualified medical practitioner. The committee is invited to consider, first, closing the petition on the basis of the response from Mr Fergus Ewing, the Minister for Community Safety, taken in conjunction with the previous work undertaken by the Public Petitions Committee; secondly, writing to the Scottish Government asking what research has been undertaken on the scale and impact of the selling on of prescribed methadone and whether measures are being undertaken to address that specific problem; or, thirdly, proposing an alternative approach. Can I have members' comments?
Official Report · Committee
Petitions
Methadone Prescriptions (PE789)
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Christine Grahame SNP 5
- Dr Richard Simpson Lab 1
- Ian McKee SNP 1
- Mary Scanlon Con 1
- Michael Matheson SNP 1
The record
9 contributionsDr McKee and I have experience of prescribing methadone in the community. It is important to consider certain facts, which I am sure the Public Petitions Committee considered. The amount of methadone being prescribed rose enormously between 1997 and 2007 because of Government policy to bring people into treatment as rapidly as possible. We will not get into a discussion on the alternatives.For the purposes of the petition, it is important to recognise that during that period of substantial increase in the prescription of methadone, the number of deaths from methadone dropped, which means that, on the whole, clinicians have acted responsibly and followed the approach to prescribing methadone that was recommended by the Minister for Community Safety in his letter and by the Scottish Advisory Committee on Drug Misuse in its report of last year.The only issue is whether further research is needed, because it is clear that there is variation in whether methadone is prescribed on a supervised or an unsupervised basis. The minister's letter refers to the guidelines of the National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse in England, which are relatively clear and state that during the initial phase of treatment, when someone is introduced to methadone, the treatment should be supervised seven days a week, if possible, although in Scotland supervision tends to be provided six days a week because only supermarket pharmacies open on a Sunday. That is an issue. In many cases, a reduction in supervision will be something that is earned. If someone's general state improves, if they respond to treatment or if they cease the use of alternative opiate drugs, they will be moved on to the unsupervised use of methadone, but there are some groups for whom that is problematic. In the most recent audit that I did in my own clinical work, 9 per cent of my clientele were in work at the time of referral. It is clear that it is more difficult for someone who is in work to obtain methadone, although the situation has improved over the past 10 years, as pharmacies have moved into supermarkets. The fact that supermarkets' pharmacy sections are often open until 9 o'clock at night means that access to methadone for people who are in work is less restricted.I make a plea to the committee: rather than close our consideration of the petition, we should write to the minister to ask him whether, in the light of the SACDM report on methadone prescribing, "Reducing harm and promoting recovery", which was published in July 2007, further research will be carried out—perhaps by SACDM's new research sub-committee, the minister's setting up of which I very much welcome—into the variations in methadone prescribing across Scotland and the presence or absence of links between those variations and deaths that occur as a direct result of methadone consumption, particularly when the victim is not in treatment. That is what the petitioner is concerned about—the leakage of methadone from people who are prescribed it to others who are not prescribed it.
Thank you for those helpful and informative comments. Our other doctor on the committee, Ian McKee, has some informative comments to provide us with.
I totally agree with what Richard Simpson said and with his proposed course of action.My only additional point is a small one about the wording of petition PE789, which asks that people who take methadone be supervised"by a suitably qualified medical practitioner".I am sure that we all agree that such supervision must be done by a suitably qualified pharmacist. If medical practitioners were to be involved in supervision, they would have to do the dispensing as well, which would lead to all sorts of other problems. The supervision should be done by suitably qualified pharmacists.
It is helpful to put that on the record.
Richard Simpson and I will have to agree to disagree on whether to be enthusiastic about the use of methadone. My party has led the debate on the issue and has supported the Government's approach in "The Road to Recovery: A New Approach to Tackling Scotland's Drug Problem" as an alternative to what is often described as parking people on methadone.The petitioner makes some excellent points, but I have two questions. I assume that the Government's audit of all the effective detox and rehab treatments, which I think is being undertaken by Audit Scotland, will include a critical appraisal of methadone treatment. Can we ask the Government to confirm whether that is the case?Secondly, in the final paragraph of his letter, Fergus Ewing says:"I note the Committee's intention to review the Government's new drugs strategy".I am not sure that that is part of our work programme. Can you clarify that?
The answer to your second question is that such a review does not form part of our work programme, so that was an error.As for your first point, you have put it on the record, so I am quite happy to refer the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing to it and to ask her to respond.On the issues to do with the policing of methadone use that members have raised, we can write to the minister for public safety—I think that that is his title.
He is called the Minister for Community Safety.
I knew that I would get the title wrong, although I was close.I will be happy to circulate the draft letters to members before they are sent out. Are members content with that suggested course of action?Members indicated agreement.
In this meeting
Everything on 1 Oct 2008 →- Scottish Parliament Health and Sport Committee Wednesday 1 October 2008 Committee business · 1
- Decision on Taking Business in Private Procedure · 1
- Subordinate Legislation Subordinate legislation · 9
- Subordinate Legislation Subordinate legislation · 1
- Petitions Petitions · 9
- Petitions Petitions · 3
- Petitions Petitions · 1
- Petitions Petitions · 8
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.