Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Continued Petitions

Horses’ Tail Hair Removal (Ban) (PE2130)

Wednesday 26 November 2025 Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee About 11:45 Petitions 3 contributions · 2 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

3 contributions
Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

PE2130, which was lodged by James A Mackie, calls on the Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce a ban on the removal of all hair from a horse’s tail, leaving a bare stump, other than for medical reasons. We previously considered the petition in March, when we agreed to write to the Government to seek further information on the work to update the “Code of Practice for the Welfare of Equidae”, including timescales for completing the update and how the petitioner and other stakeholders might contribute to the process.

In the Scottish Government’s response, which was sent to the committee in April, it was stated that the new equine code was being drafted by stakeholders and that the Government was confident that a

“sufficiently wide-ranging and varied base of equine expertise”

was already contributing to the development of the new code. The Government anticipated that the code would be published by late summer, but there is no evidence that that happened.

In addition, in their submissions, the petitioner and the charity Animal Concern suggest that a number of organisations are supportive of a ban. They also point to the decision that was taken by the Great Yorkshire Show to ban all horses with shaved tails from any competition or exhibition.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action? Given that we were promised that something would be published by the end of the summer, which did not happen, it might be appropriate for us to keep the petition open a little bit longer and to write to the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity to ask for a progress report and a rather more clear timeline for the publication of the Scottish Government’s equine code.

Fergus Ewing Ind Inverness and Nairn
link

I agree. In doing so, we could ask the Government to respond to the petitioner’s submission of 30 October and Animal Concern’s submission of 5 November. The petitioner pointed out that we should perhaps have written to the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, and I think that he is probably right. So, mea culpa, or perhaps nostra culpa—that was our fault. I thought that I should put that on the record, because I am grateful to the petitioner for pointing that out.

There is quite a lot in the submissions from the petitioner and Animal Concern, so it would be helpful to put those points to the minister, although the main point is that, although the Government promised that the code would be published in the summer, it has not yet materialised.

Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

Thank you, Mr Ewing. Due to your erudition, Latin is used more frequently in this committee than it is in any other committee of the Parliament. In any event—mea culpa, nostra culpa or whatever—are we content to keep the petition open and to pursue the issues as described?

Members indicated agreement.

  1. 09:30 Decision on Taking Business in Private Procedure · 1
  2. 09:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 139
  3. 11:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 9
  4. 11:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 9
  5. 11:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 4
  7. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  8. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. 12:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 5
  10. 12:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  11. 12:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 7
  12. 12:00 New Petitions Petitions · 1
  13. 12:00 New Petitions Petitions · 8
  14. 12:00 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  15. 12:00 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  16. 12:00 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  17. 12:00 New Petitions Petitions · 9

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.