Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Early Learning and Childcare (Independent Review) (PE2112)

Wednesday 30 October 2024 Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee About 12:15 Petitions 4 contributions · 2 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

4 contributions
Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

PE2112, which was lodged by Carole Erskine on behalf of Pregnant Then Screwed, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to commission an independent review of publicly funded early learning and childcare in Scotland, in order to better understand and address the challenges that families face when trying to secure and afford childcare.

The background to the petition provides details of the petitioner’s survey that looked at childcare in Scotland, in which 83.7 per cent of parents said that their childcare costs are the same or more than their income, with 70 per cent of mothers and 50 per cent of fathers responding to say that it does not make financial sense for them to work. The SPICe briefing notes that, although data from surveys conducted by Coram Family and Childcare shows that childcare costs in Scotland are rising, they remain lower than the average prices that have been reported for England and Wales.

In its response to the petition, which is similar to the response that we received on the previous petition, the Scottish Government states that it is investing nearly £1 billion in high-quality early learning and childcare in 2024-25. The response goes on to highlight the funding follows the child approach for the delivery of the 1,140 hours ELC offer, which allows parents and carers to

“access their child’s entitlement from any setting in the public, private or third sector ... who meets the National Standard, has a place available, and is willing to enter into a contract with their local authority. ”

The Scottish Government’s response also refers to independent research that suggests that

“97% of parents with a three- to five-year-old were satisfied that they could access funded ELC in a way that meets their needs.”

It notes that an evaluation of the 1,140 hours entitlement is due to report in 2025.

We have also received two submissions from the petitioner, the first of which comments on the Scottish Government’s response and draws our attention to a review of the early years sector in England, which was commissioned by the UK Labour Party before it entered government. The petitioner has called for a similar review to take place in Scotland. The second submission highlights the mostly negative experiences of the childcare system that parents have encountered, including issues around availability, council boundary changes, and the inflexibility of the current system to meet families’ needs.

Submissions have also been received from the University of the West of Scotland, drawing our attention to research that it has undertaken on the challenges that are faced by mothers who are working in the performance arts and entertainment industry, and from our MSP colleague Tim Eagle in support of the petition’s aim.

In the light of the information that we have received from the Scottish Government and SPICe, do colleagues have any suggestions on how we might proceed?

David Torrance SNP Kirkcaldy
link

I wonder whether the committee would like to write to the National Day Nurseries Association, the Scottish Private Nursery Association, the parents group—Connect—and COSLA to seek views on the issues that have been raised by the petition. The committee could also write to the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, highlighting the submissions that the committee has received and the call that was raised in PE2111 to fund early learning and childcare from nine months old. The committee could seek an update on the work to develop new childcare offers, including details of any discussion that the Scottish Government has had with the UK Government on the issue, specifically the financial support that is available to families.

Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

Are members content with that?

Members indicated agreement.

Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

That concludes our consideration of new petitions. Our next meeting will be on 13 November. We now move into private session to consider agenda items 4 and 5.

12:34 Meeting continued in private until 12:45.

  1. 09:30 Decision on Taking Business in Private Procedure · 1
  2. 09:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 148
  3. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  4. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 8
  5. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  7. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  8. 12:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 7
  9. 12:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  10. 12:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  11. 12:15 New Petitions Petitions · 1
  12. 12:15 New Petitions Petitions · 4
  13. 12:15 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  14. 12:15 New Petitions Petitions · 4

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.