Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Continued Petitions

Brownfield Sites (Remediation and Reuse) (PE1943)

Wednesday 22 March 2023 Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee About 09:45 Petitions 5 contributions · 2 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

5 contributions
Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

PE1943, which was lodged by Victoria Mungall, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce financial support mechanisms that would enable local authorities to work alongside developers in bringing brownfield sites back into use while also discouraging developments on greenfield land. When we last considered the petition, on 26 October, we agreed to wait until the national planning framework 4 was finalised. We also agreed to write to a number of organisations seeking their views.

Members will be aware that NPF4 has now been finalised and was approved by Parliament on 11 January. We have also received responses from Clyde Gateway, the Royal Town Planning Institute Scotland and the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland. I also note that the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities declined to provide a formal response to the petition on this occasion.

The responses that we have received detail some of the challenges of developing long-term vacant and derelict sites, such as fragmented land ownership and ground conditions, while highlighting the funding streams that are available to support the redevelopment and regeneration of those sites. In particular, the Royal Town Planning Institute highlighted the work of the Scottish Land Commission on the matter and the recommendations to review and evaluate funding streams to ensure that they incorporate criteria that will help direct investment to parts of the country that need it most.

On that basis, do members have any suggestions?

Fergus Ewing SNP Inverness and Nairn
link

National planning framework 4 has been published. Funding streams are available, such as the vacant and derelict land investment programme and the regeneration capital grant fund, which provide, in principle, what the petitioners are looking for, namely a means to incentivise the restoration of brownfield sites as opposed to always going for new greenfield sites. When we considered the petition previously, Paul Sweeney said:

“the renovation and retrofitting of existing buildings is subject to 20 per cent VAT, but demolition and new builds are zero rated, so a handicap is imposed on what should be the right thing to do.”—Official Report, Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee, 26 October 2022; c 35.

That is a fair point, but it is not really within the power of the Scottish Parliament to deal with the VAT on that, as I understand it.

Fergus Ewing SNP Inverness and Nairn
link

Mr Torrance suggested that we wait until NPF4 was finalised. Given that it has now been finalised and that there are funding vehicles, we have perhaps taken the petition as far as we can. If it subsequently emerges that the petitioner feels that those funds are insufficient, she could raise the matter again. I am not sure, however, that we can go any further with the petition, given the inquiries that we have made and the evidence that we have received.

Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

That is a sympathetic and comprehensive response. Are colleagues agreed that we will write to the petitioner, confirming the information that we have received and the fact that NPF4 has been published, and that we will close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

  1. 09:30 Decisions on Taking Business in Private Procedure · 2
  2. 09:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  3. 09:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  4. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 5
  5. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 5
  7. 09:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 4
  8. 09:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 16
  10. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 4
  11. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  12. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 4

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.