Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Justice for the Public in the Legal System (PE1851)

Wednesday 1 September 2021 Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee About 10:00 Petitions 3 contributions · 2 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

3 contributions
Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

PE1851, which was lodged by Melanie Collins and William Tait, calls on the Scottish Government to urgently review and reform the Scottish legal system, including through an update of systems and practices to ensure that bodies, authorities and institutions are fit for purpose.

In its written submission, the Scottish Government outlines its on-going work on the reform of legal services regulation, the judicial register of interests, law reform, legal aid reform and mediation. In relation to legal services regulation, it highlights the independent review that it commissioned, which was chaired by Esther Roberton.

Although the review concluded that the current complaints system was not fit for purpose, the Scottish Government explains that it is seeking to build consensus, where possible, on the way forward prior to deciding on a course of action. Although progress has been disrupted by the impact of Brexit and the Covid-19 pandemic, the Scottish Government anticipates that it will be able to publish a consultation seeking views on a way forward during this session of Parliament.

The submission also highlights work to progress interim improvements to the complaints system ahead of wider reform. The consultation on those changes ended in February this year, and the Scottish Government is currently analysing the responses.

In their submission, the petitioners state that the issues in their petition are important and

“impact on all living in Scotland.”

Does anyone have any thoughts on the course of action that we might take?

David Torrance SNP Kirkcaldy
link

Considering that the Scottish Government plans to lodge secondary legislation and given the work that the Criminal Justice Committee is already doing on a previous petition, we should close the petition under rule 15.7 of the standing orders. If the petitioners are not happy with the outcome, they could bring the petition back in a year’s time.

Jackson Carlaw Con The Convener · Eastwood
link

Do members have any other thoughts? I am minded to close the petition, but is there any merit in writing again to the Scottish Government to get some further guidance on when in the session it might bring something forward? The session is quite a wide canvas at this stage; it has only just begun, so it could be at any time in the next five years. It would be interesting to know when the Government is thinking of lodging any secondary legislation. However, we could close the petition in any event, seek that information and advise the petitioners of it. Is that agreed?

Members indicated agreement.

  1. 10:00 New Petitions Petitions · 1
  2. 10:00 New Petitions Petitions · 4
  3. 10:00 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  4. 10:00 New Petitions Petitions · 5
  5. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 10
  7. 10:30 New Petitions Petitions · 9
  8. 10:30 New Petitions Petitions · 5
  9. 10:30 New Petitions Petitions · 13
  10. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 7
  11. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  12. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 1
  13. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  14. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  15. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 7

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.