Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Snooker and Pool Venues (Covid Restrictions) (PE1848)

Wednesday 13 January 2021 Public Petitions Committee About 09:45 Petitions 6 contributions · 5 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

6 contributions
Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

PE1848, by Paul Marinello, calls on the Scottish Government to allow snooker and pool venues to open at all levels of the five-tier system of coronavirus restrictions, except tier 4.

In his initial written submission, the petitioner challenges the assessments that have informed the Government’s decisions on snooker and pool halls. He states that halls have good mechanical ventilation as part of their licensing requirements; that physically distancing is aided by the size of the tables that are being used; and that players wear face masks while in play. The petitioner also highlights that snooker is the only non-contact sport that is not allowed to operate in tier 3, which he considers to be unfair.

Since the publication of our papers, the committee has received a response from the Government. It explains that

“the decisions on what can open during the different tiers are set out in our Strategic Framework, which includes measures across a wide number of settings and provides a comprehensive approach to reducing infection rates and suppressing the spread of the virus.”

It says that, although the Government currently has

“no plans to allow pool and snooker halls to reopen outside of tiers 0 and 1”,

it keeps

“the content of the Strategic Framework under regular review.”

The committee has also received two submissions from Scottish Snooker, which is the national governing body for snooker and billiards in Scotland. In the submissions, the organisation echoes the petitioner’s concerns about the assessments that have been made and suggests that the strategic framework, as it relates to snooker and pool, is based on incorrect information.

The committee has received an additional submission from the petitioner, in response to the Scottish Government’s submission. He reiterates his challenge to the framework and states that

“everything should be done that is necessary to fight covid 19 and save lives”,

but

“no business or sport should be unnecessarily disadvantaged either, should there be a solution.”

This is an interesting petition. The petitioner makes a strong case for a proper understanding of what snooker and pool venues do. I guess that, in the current context—we are at the height of the crisis—there is not a lot of room for movement. However, it is the role of individual businesses and organisations to flag up such matters. Government cannot fully understand how different businesses operate, and the petitioner makes an interesting and important case. There are examples in other areas, too, of the officials drawing up the framework without having a particular awareness or understanding of how individual businesses operate. There are interesting issues to be flagged up that can inform any future decision making.

Gail Ross SNP Caithness, Sutherland and Ross
link

I think that there are two main points. My initial reaction is that I do not want to challenge any decision that has been made regarding the Covid regulations, because if we did so and there was then an outbreak, that would be quite negligent of us. However, as the convener said, the argument that the framework assessment is in some way flawed merits further action. I want to flag up the issue and write to the cabinet secretary and the Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Affairs Committee as part of its on-going considerations.

The convener is right that, if changes are to be made, it will be very difficult to get any made now, but I have great sympathy with any businesses that are struggling in the current financial climate. It must be awful for them. Some important points have been made. We should take further action by writing to the aforementioned people and to the committee.

Tom Mason Con North East Scotland
link

This is an interesting petition. The industry has advocated what it wants, given its circumstances, in detail. It is right that any activity should be examined in detail to ensure that the logic to closing down businesses, if that is necessary, is clearly articulated. Writing to the cabinet secretary and the committee is the right thing to do. The assessment could then act as a framework for the study of other industries, and it could show what needs to be done to maintain businesses. We cannot just close everything, or else nothing will be left in the end. One gets to the point of thinking, “What’s the point of doing anything if everything closes down?”

It is right to keep the petition open and to write to the cabinet secretary and the committee.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

In that case, we agree that important issues have been raised. We recognise how difficult the challenges are. The deputy convener talked about how difficult it is to make judgments in the current context, but specific issues relating to particular businesses should be taken into account in decision making.

We agree that we will write to the relevant cabinet secretary and the Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Affairs Committee to highlight the issues that have been flagged up to us.

  1. 09:00 New Petitions Petitions · 8
  2. 09:00 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  3. 09:15 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  4. 09:15 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  5. 09:30 New Petitions Petitions · 10
  6. 09:30 New Petitions Petitions · 9
  7. 09:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  8. 09:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. 10:00 New Petitions Petitions · 8
  10. 10:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 8
  11. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  12. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  13. 10:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  14. 10:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  15. 10:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.