Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Continued Petitions

Paramedic Students (NHS Bursary) (PE1819)

Wednesday 16 December 2020 Public Petitions Committee About 11:45–12:00 Petitions 6 contributions · 5 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

6 contributions
Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

PE1819, which has been lodged by Rachel Taylor, calls on the Government to introduce a bursary for paramedic students in Scotland.

In her submission, the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport states:

“The Scottish Government agrees that the issue of financial support for students undertaking a degree in paramedic science is worth further consideration”,

and reiterates that that it will form part of the planned allied health professions education review.

The cabinet secretary also states that the Government is “happy to engage” with the petitioner and her fellow campaigners, highlighting that the Minister for Health, Sport and Wellbeing has recently accepted an invitation to meet the campaign group.

In her response, the petitioner acknowledges the review, but explains that it might take some time and that student paramedics require financial support now. She believes that without increased support for student paramedics, the BSc paramedic science course will be accessible only to those who can support themselves.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action? I think that at one point in her written evidence the cabinet secretary says that competition for places is very high. However, people with financial problems might not even be able to be part of that and are not getting the chance to compete—they are being excluded from the competition because of their financial situation.

I recall hearing effective evidence in our evidence-taking session a couple of months ago. I am encouraged that the cabinet secretary has committed to engage with the petitioner and that work is being done around the education review for the allied health professions. On that basis, we might want to think about closing the petition. However, I would want reassurances from the Government that it understands that access, justice and fairness are all big issues in relation to training.

Gail Ross SNP Caithness, Sutherland and Ross
link

I agree. In its response, the Government places a lot of emphasis on the support that paramedic students already get in Scotland, including there being no tuition fees and the starting salary. However, as the petitioner points out, why are paramedics treated different from nurses and midwives? They also must do on-the-job training, which prevents them from getting an additional job. Therefore, it is only people who can really afford it who can proceed. The petitioner is absolutely right that that is not equitable.

I agree that it is good to see that there will be engagement with the petitioner and that the issue is being considered. The committee has done quite a lot of work on the topic. Due to the petitioner’s tenacity, the matter is being looked at and they should be congratulated for that. I do not know whether there is much more that we can do at the moment until we see where this is going.

I agree that we have no choice but to close the petition. However, I highlight to the petitioner that, if they are not happy with the direction of travel, they would not have to wait a year to bring the petition back as would normally be the case; they can do so in the new session of Parliament, which they might want to do.

12:00

Maurice Corry Con West Scotland
link

I concur with Gail Ross, and seek to close the petition under rule 15.7. I have confidence in proposing the closure because I am encouraged by the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport’s response of 20 October in which she is reasonably supportive of financial support and has agreed to consider the matter further.

The convener alluded to allied health professionals. In the process of closing the petition, perhaps we can correspond with the Government on the point that you raised.

David Torrance SNP Kirkcaldy
link

I do not think that the committee can take the petition any further. The key point for me is that the Government is engaging directly with the petitioner, which is really good. It is also considering financial support for paramedic students. Therefore, I am quite happy to close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders.

Tom Mason Con North East Scotland
link

I agree with my colleagues. We need to close the petition because we have gone as far as we can go. However, if we can get some assurance as to the timescale of the review that might be useful, just to prod the process along a bit.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

We agree to close the petition under rule 15.7. We are reassured that the Government is engaging with the petitioner. If that proves to be unsatisfactory, the petitioner clearly has the opportunity to return to us.

However, I want to write to the Government to highlight the equity issue—that is, even though lots of people might be competing for a place, some people are unable to take up the opportunity and are excluded from that competition because of their financial position. I also want to raise with the Government Gail Ross’s point about other allied health professions getting bursaries. That question has never really been answered. It would not be sufficient to say, “Well, it is because it is popular”, given that not getting bursaries excludes people. It rather begs the question why the Government has moved in that direction, given that people were able to work and learn on the job. However, that is a broader question.

In closing the petition, we recognise how far the petitioner and her fellow campaigners have taken the issue. We hope that they will keep the matter under review—I am sure that they will. There is an opportunity to come back if they consider that doing so would be useful. We will write to the Government to highlight and ask about the question of equity.

  1. 09:30 Decision on Taking Business in Private Procedure · 1
  2. 09:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 54
  3. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 7
  4. 10:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 10
  5. 10:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 7
  6. 10:30 Continued Petitions Petitions · 10
  7. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  8. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 10
  9. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 15
  10. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 7
  11. 11:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  12. 12:00 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  13. 12:00 New Petitions Petitions · 10
  14. 12:30 New Petitions Petitions · 8
  15. 12:30 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  16. 12:45 New Petitions Petitions · 8

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.