Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Continued Petitions

School Curriculum (British Sign Language) (PE1777)

Thursday 1 October 2020 Public Petitions Committee About 11:15 Petitions 8 contributions · 5 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

8 contributions
Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

The final continued petition for consideration is PE1777, which calls on the Scottish Government to introduce British Sign Language into the curriculum for excellence, and was lodged by Scott Macmillan. The petition was last considered in January 2020. Since that meeting, the committee has received written submissions from the Scottish Government and the petitioner.

In his written submission, the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills confirms that BSL can already be part of the curriculum in schools as the second additional language, or L3, being taught.

In his response, the petitioner states that BSL should be an essential language to learn. He therefore suggests that the Scottish Government should consider designating BSL as a first additional language—L2—which can be taught from P1.

The petition is really interesting. Ever since I was young, it has seemed to me that we should all be taught how to speak to people who use British Sign Language and that it should be much more universally understood. The Parliament has already made progress in legislating in that field and I find the argument quite compelling that, as the petitioner suggests, BSL should be a first additional language. I found it to be an important argument that relates to the issue of access and people’s ability to engage completely in their communities.

I welcome members’ comments.

Maurice Corry Con West Scotland
link

I am certainly of a mind to keep the petition open. I know people who have a deafness issue, and I think that it is important that we write to the Scottish Government to ask it to consider designating British Sign Language as an L2 rather than an L3 additional language under its one plus two approach. We should write to the Scottish Government to seek further information to push forward on the petition.

David Torrance SNP Kirkcaldy
link

I fully support what Maurice Corry has said. We should write to the Scottish Government to ask if it will consider designating British Sign Language as an L2 rather than an L3 language. I am happy for the committee to do that.

Gail Ross SNP Caithness, Sutherland and Ross
link

I will now sign “Thank you” in British Sign Language, convener, as I have actually been learning some BSL during lockdown. It was one of the things that I challenged myself to do and it has been extremely interesting and challenging.

I agree that we should write to the Scottish Government. For the life of me, I cannot see a reason why BSL is designated as an L3 rather than an L2 language, and I would like to get an explanation of that and push for it to be included from a very early age.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

Thank you, Gail—I am glad to see that somebody used lockdown more productively than I perhaps did.

Tom Mason Con North East Scotland
link

Sign language is important. However, I can see some problems with the various dialects within the language. That causes problems even across the UK, let alone on an international basis. However, bringing British Sign Language up the league to L2 should be considered and a discussion with the Government about that would be worth while. Therefore, we should write to the Scottish Government to that end.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

Obviously, challenges of dialect are not unique to British Sign Language. In many areas of development in language, it is about how a language is lived as well as how it is taught in some circumstances.

I think that the committee is agreed that there is an issue and that we will write to the Scottish Government simply to ask whether it will consider redesignating British Sign Language in recognition of the fact that it is an important part of communication for many people. We look forward to receiving a response. The petitioner will of course be able to comment on any submission from the Scottish Government.

We have reached the end of our consideration of petitions. I note that my technology has managed to stick with it for the whole meeting and that I have not dropped out of the system—whether that is for good or ill, it is progress for me. I thank everybody, including the petitioners, for their engagement with the committee and I thank broadcasting and the clerks for facilitating the challenging work of a virtual committee meeting.

Meeting closed at 11:23.

  1. 09:30 New Petitions Petitions · 48
  2. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 7
  3. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 7
  4. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  5. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  6. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  7. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  8. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  10. 11:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 8

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.