Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

Local Authority Financial Powers (Reform) (PE1816)

Thursday 1 October 2020 Public Petitions Committee About 10:15 Petitions 7 contributions · 5 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

7 contributions
Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

The next new petition for consideration is PE1816, lodged by Lewis McCathie. The petition calls on the Scottish Government to reform the financial powers of local authorities by reforming the council tax and devolving more tax powers to local authorities.

In his written submission, the Minister for Public Finance and Migration states that the Scottish Government agrees that the present system of council tax must end, but says that, at present, there is not a cross-party consensus on what should replace it. He explains that efforts are under way to redevelop such a consensus and that, although the work was paused as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, he hopes that those efforts will recommence in the autumn.

The committee has also received a written submission from Patricia Brown, who considers the present system to be unfair. As the assessment of council tax liability is based on property valuations from 1991, Mrs Brown states that properties built after 1991 are not being treated equally.

There are, clearly, important issues here. There is political consensus that the council tax is problematic, but there is no consensus on the way forward. At this stage, the Scottish Government seems to be focused on building political consensus rather than on taking a position and seeing whether people will support it. I think that the matter will be discussed—it is an issue that we are aware of. People have been positive about the devolution of additional taxes. The tourist tax, for example, has certainly been welcomed; others have been slightly more contentious.

The idea of giving local authorities more control over raising revenue is important. In the recent period, the approach has gone in the other direction, partly because of the council tax freeze.

I certainly consider that there should be more autonomy at a local level. In cities such as Glasgow, where I live, the idea of the city region seems to have fallen out of favour, but the idea of individual cities being economic generators and needing powers in order to develop is a whole other matter.

All those issues are politically important. However, my sense is that, although the petition highlights the issues, when it comes to considering what we can do, it simply provides us with the argument that there is a problem. Obviously, politically and much more broadly, the Parliament will need to find solutions to the issue. My view is that we should close the petition. The issue is not going away and it is one that all the political parties will continue to wrestle with.

What are members’ views?

David Torrance SNP Kirkcaldy
link

I agree with you, convener. We should close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government agrees that the present council tax system must end; that cross-party talks to identity an alternative have begun; and that the Scottish Government is working with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities to develop a rules-based framework for local government funding.

If the petitioner is not happy with progress, they can always bring the issue back in a year’s time.

Gail Ross SNP Caithness, Sutherland and Ross
link

I agree with David Torrance and you, convener. It is good that there are cross-party talks, rather than something being forced through. On this issue, everyone must agree the solution to be workable and fair. I agree that we should close the petition.

Tom Mason Con North East Scotland
link

I basically agree with what has been said. We need to get rid of the council tax, because it is not working for a whole load of reasons. My only hope is that when the discussions happen, the options for a localised tax are far wider than those that have been volunteered so far, as they are limiting in what they can do.

I would welcome a city region process taking place, but I will probably be in my box by the time that happens, unfortunately. Laughter.

Maurice Corry Con West Scotland
link

I agree with most of Tom Mason’s points, and everyone else’s, so I would be happy to close the petition.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

In that case, we agree to close the position under rule 15.7 of standing orders. We know that the Government agrees that the present council tax system must end and that cross-party talks are taking place.

The matter is one that will have to be resolved politically. As David Torrance highlighted, if the petitioner feels that, in a year’s time, there has not been any progress, there will be an opportunity to bring the petition back to the committee.

In closing the petition, we thank the petitioner very much for their engagement with us on the important issues that have been raised.

  1. 09:30 New Petitions Petitions · 48
  2. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 7
  3. 10:15 New Petitions Petitions · 7
  4. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  5. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  6. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  7. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  8. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  9. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 6
  10. 11:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 8

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.