Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

New Petitions

School Curriculum (British Sign Language) (PE1777)

Thursday 30 January 2020 Public Petitions Committee About 11:00 Petitions 5 contributions · 3 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

5 contributions
Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

The final new petition for consideration is PE177, which calls on the Scottish Government to introduce British Sign Language into curriculum for excellence.

Our briefing explains that very little of the school curriculum is statutory, although local authorities have a statutory duty to secure an adequate and efficient education for children of school age. Beyond that, young people are largely able to choose which qualifications they wish to take. The Scottish Qualifications Authority offers a number of qualifications on BSL.

The British Sign Language (Scotland) Act 2015 places a duty on the Scottish Government

“to promote, and facilitate the promotion of, the use and understanding of British Sign Language”.

Local authorities must also produce BSL plans that set out what they will do in relation to use of BSL.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?

Maurice Corry Con West Scotland
link

We should seek the views of the Scottish Government and Education Scotland, because the issue comes back to my point about learning support. It is important that it is looked at.

Gail Ross SNP Caithness, Sutherland and Ross
link

I agree. Notwithstanding the petition, I have heard of a push from a number of sides to have BSL included in the curriculum. It would be interesting to hear the position of the Scottish Government and Education Scotland.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

The issue has featured in Parliament since its beginning. Back in the day, there was a lot of very effective campaigning on teacher training. Of course, now we have the 2015 act.

I have been in conversation with young people who use BSL. One of their issues is the capacity of BSL teachers to operate at the level that is appropriate to their level of learning. It is not the basic stuff—for people who are trying to learn advanced higher physics, a much higher BSL skill level is required.

BSL should be more embedded in the system. It is such a basic thing: young people should be able to communicate with other young people, and the matter very much goes along with what we regard as inclusive education.

It would be interesting to write to the Scottish Government and Education Scotland. We would also be interested to hear from anyone else who has an interest in and is aware of the petition. We do not have to write to them, but such organisations might wish to say what they think introducing BSL into the curriculum would look like, and to give their views on schools’ capacity to deliver that. There are some positive actions to take. Do members agree to do that?

Members indicated agreement.

Johann Lamont Lab The Convener · Glasgow
link

We have come to the end of our agenda. I thank everyone for their attendance.

Meeting closed at 11:17.

  1. 09:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 200
  2. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 3
  3. 10:15 Continued Petitions Petitions · 4
  4. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 8
  5. 10:45 Continued Petitions Petitions · 8
  6. 10:45 New Petitions Petitions · 3
  7. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 6
  8. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 9
  9. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 5
  10. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 5
  11. 11:00 New Petitions Petitions · 5

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.