To ask the Scottish Government, further to the First Minister’s meeting with the family of Shaun Woodburn, who was killed on new year’s day 2017, what plans it has to enhance the rights of victims during court procedures. (S5O-01779)
Official Report · Chamber
Victim Rights (Court Procedures)
General Question Time
Speakers
Choose an MSP to read only their contributions- Kezia Dugdale Lab 2
- Michael Matheson SNP 2
The record
4 contributionsThe First Minister and I met Shaun Woodburn’s family on 10 January. We were both struck by the dignity with which they have conducted themselves in such difficult circumstances. I understand that the family are with us in the chamber today and I take the opportunity to offer again my condolences for their tragic loss.
This Government has already taken a number of steps to enhance the rights of victims. The Victims and Witnesses (Scotland) Act 2014 improved the support and information made available to victims. That includes providing victims and bereaved relatives with new rights to access information and reasons for decisions made about their case. It also created a duty on justice organisations to set clear standards of service, so that victims know what to expect and whom to contact if the service that they receive does not meet their expectations. In addition, we published the “Victims’ Code for Scotland”, which clearly and simply sets out the rights of victims in one place.
It is important that we continue to listen to the experience of victims and their families and consider further improvements that can be made. Indeed, we are currently working with our justice partners and victims organisations to explore a single-point-of-contact model for victim support. That will help to ensure that those who experience serious crimes receive a consistent and individually tailored level of support for as long as they feel is necessary.
Shaun’s killer received a sentence of just four years. The family, who have shared their story with the Daily Record today, believe that the sentence should have been longer—of course, they do. They also accept that that is why an independent judge determines these matters—not the media, not victims’ families and not even politicians—but what they cannot understand is why no one will explain why that decision was made, what the process was, what was considered and what was not considered.
When I raised this with Lord Carloway, he drew my attention to section 6 of the 2014 act, which gives victims the right to request the final decision of a court in a trial and any reasons for it. Given that right, which was delivered by the cabinet secretary’s Government, why has the sentencing report not been shared with the family and what steps will the Government take to improve the transparency of court proceedings?
Sentencing in any given case, including decisions relating to the publication of sentencing statements, is a matter for the court. A judge will often give reasons for imposing a particular sentence in court at the time of sentencing or, where the disposal is under challenge, in a subsequent report to the appeal court. The sentencing of convicted persons is usually announced orally in court and, in certain cases, a sentencing statement may also be published thereafter.
The decision on whether to publish a sentencing statement is at the discretion of the independent judge in the performance of their judicial function; the Scottish Government cannot interfere with that. However, we as a Government support transparency in sentencing, so that everyone involved in a case can understand the reasons why a sentence has been given.
As I mentioned previously, in the meeting with Mr Woodburn’s family on 10 January, the victims’ code provides relatives with the opportunity to request of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service that the reasons for sentencing decisions be published and made available to the family.
Of course, I will ensure that the issues that the member has raised are highlighted to the Lord President to see whether any further progress can be made on improving how the system is operating.
Motions, questions and votes
Linked from this item of the Official ReportIn this meeting
Everything on 8 Feb 2018 →- ScotRail (Meetings) Questions · 8
- Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report Questions · 4
- Short-term Letting of Domestic Flats Questions · 4
- Broadband Connectivity Questions · 5
- Victim Rights (Court Procedures) Questions · 4
- Scottish Police Authority (Process for Appointment of Chair) First Minister’s Questions · 9
- Police Scotland First Minister’s Questions · 7
- Blueprint Recruitment Ltd First Minister’s Questions · 2
- Coul Links (Golf Development) First Minister’s Questions · 2
- Regional Performance Centre (Dundee) First Minister’s Questions · 2
- Prestwick Airport First Minister’s Questions · 8
- Stagecoach (Rail Contracts) First Minister’s Questions · 2
- Freedom of Information Requests First Minister’s Questions · 2
- Social Care Visits First Minister’s Questions · 2
- Mortuary Standards First Minister’s Questions · 2
- Bank Branches (Rural Scotland) First Minister’s Questions · 4
- Protection from Abuse (Politicians and Candidates) First Minister’s Questions · 6
- Support for Mortgage Interest Scheme First Minister’s Questions · 4
- Saltire Prize for Marine Energy First Minister’s Questions · 6
- East Neuk First Responders Members’ business · 7
- Islands (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1 Bill debate · 65
- Point of Order Procedure · 2
- Islands (Scotland) Bill: Financial Resolution Bill debate · 2
- Decision Time Decision time · 2
The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.