Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Petitions

Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (Review) (PE1342, PE1343, PE1344, PE1345, PE1346, PE1347, PE1348 and PE1349)

Wednesday 9 February 2011 Local Government and Communities Committee About 10:00 Petitions 9 contributions · 4 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

9 contributions
Duncan McNeil Lab The Convener · Greenock and Inverclyde
link

Item 5 is consideration of eight petitions that call on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to commission an independent review of the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman to make it more accountable for its performance, including the extent to which its investigations are fair and robust, and to widen its remit so that it can enforce recommendations that it makes following investigations into actions of public bodies. The petitions to be considered are PE1342, by Phyllis and Robert French; PE1343, by Sandra Smith; PE1344, by Philip Hawthorne; PE1345, by James Smith; PE1346, by William Whiteside; PE1347, by Christina Cumming; PE1348, by Mr and Mrs Corbett; and PE1349, by Iris Innes.I invite members to discuss the petitions and to consider options 1, 2 and 3, as outlined in paper LGC/S3/11/5/5.

Alex Johnstone Con North East Scotland
link

Before the discussion begins, given some of the correspondence that we have had on the subject, I draw to my colleagues’ attention the fact that I am an elected member of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body.

Duncan McNeil Lab The Convener · Greenock and Inverclyde
link

Do you want to add anything further on the proposals in the paper?

John Wilson SNP Central Scotland
link

I point out to members that, as a member of the Public Petitions Committee, I sat in consideration of these petitions.

Duncan McNeil Lab The Convener · Greenock and Inverclyde
link

Okay. Do you have any comments to add to that?

Alasdair Morgan SNP South of Scotland
link

On the basis of what we have heard from the SPCB in Paul Grice’s letter, but more particularly in view of what we heard from the ombudsman the last time he appeared before us, we should take no further action on the petitions and close them.

Duncan McNeil Lab The Convener · Greenock and Inverclyde
link

Do members agree to Alasdair Morgan’s suggestion, which is option 1, which is that we should close the petitions under rule 15.7 of the standing orders and take no further action?Members indicated agreement. Meeting closed at 12:00.

  1. 10:00 Subordinate Legislation Subordinate legislation · 22
  2. 10:00 Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services Evidence session · 115
  3. 10:00 Petitions Petitions · 9

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.