Parliament Workbench
Data: Official Report to 12 Nov 2026

Official Report · Committee

Current Petitions

Court Reporters (PE1257)

Tuesday 4 May 2010 Public Petitions Committee About 14:00 Petitions 8 contributions · 4 speakers

Speakers

Choose an MSP to read only their contributions

The record

8 contributions
The Convener
link

The final current petition is PE1257, by Mark Hutchison, which calls on the Parliament to urge the Government to take measures to ensure that solicitors who act as court reporters and who knowingly supply false information to a sheriff are not immune from prosecution, and that their reports are amended to correct any inaccuracies before a decision by the court is made.Do members have any comments on the petition, which we have discussed in detail? I suggest that we close it.

Nigel Don
link

I fully understand where the petitioner is coming from. He clearly feels aggrieved and that the solutions that were available to him are inadequate.I note that we have a copy of a letter from a sheriff principal explaining the lie of the land. It is clear that the courts are not at all interested in having their judgments impugned by other people, other than through the appropriate legal process. The letter states quite categorically where the courts are coming from. Solicitors acting as court reporters are immune from prosecution, and courts are not going to entertain that. We have explored the issue. Other remedies were available, but that is, quite simply, the law. We have done what we can. Again, the petitioner will not be happy, but I do not think that we can take the petition any further, and I suggest that we close it.

Rhona Brankin
link

I think that the petition came to the committee before I became a member. From whom did we seek information in the interests of the complainant or the consumer in this kind of situation?

Fergus Cochrane
link

I cannot remember every organisation, but I know that the committee wrote to the Scottish Government, the Law Society of Scotland, the Faculty of Advocates, Consumer Focus and two or three other organisations that I cannot remember off the top of my head. The petitioner has also had the opportunity to comment at each stage.

Rhona Brankin
link

Was Consumer Focus’s response significantly different from those of the others?

Fergus Cochrane
link

I cannot remember the terms of the response.

Rhona Brankin
link

I am not really in a position to comment, so I will go with what the rest of the committee thinks.

The Convener
link

We will close the petition on the grounds that we have discussed.

  1. 14:00 New Petitions Petitions · 44
  2. 14:00 New Petitions Petitions · 30
  3. 14:00 New Petitions Petitions · 8
  4. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 2
  5. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  6. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 1
  7. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  8. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  9. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 3
  10. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 7
  11. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 6
  12. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  13. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 4
  14. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 5
  15. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  16. 14:00 Current Petitions Petitions · 8
  17. 14:00 New Petitions (Notification) Petitions · 1
  18. 14:00 Work Programme Procedure · 6

The type of each item (debate, statement, questions, members’ business and so on) and the times shown are worked out by this site from headings, the chair’s opening words and the Official Report’s running timestamps. They are not the Parliament’s own classification. Text: the Scottish Parliament Official Report.