Parliament Workbench
Data: Motions & questions to 19 Nov 2026

Written Question · S1W-26494 · Session 1

Further to the answers to questions S1W-25569 and S1W-26060 by Mr Jim Wallace on 24 and 30 May 2002 respectively, why the performance point…

Answered Asked by Michael Matheson SNP Lodged 6 Jun 2002

The question

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answers to questions S1W-25569 and S1W-26060 by Mr Jim Wallace on 24 and 30 May 2002 respectively, why the performance points accrued under measure 2.1(i) of Schedule F of the Minute of Agreement between the Secretary of State for Scotland and Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited for the Design, Construction, Management and Financing of a Prison at Kilmarnock are not a multiple of 10 in the first two years, if all security breaches relate to areas to which Category B prisoners had access and therefore every breach incurred 10 performance points.

The answer

Answered by Jim Wallace on 20 Jun 2002 · 14 days after it was lodged, on time

I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:A single breach, in each of the two years, took place in areas to which only Category C or D prisoners had access.

In the Official Report

No contribution in the Official Report cites S1W-26494 by reference.