Parliament Workbench
Data: Motions & questions to 19 Nov 2026

Written Question · S1W-07980 · Session 1

How many requests from local authorities to dispose of land or property at less than full market value it has refused since 1 July 1999, br…

Answered Asked by Murray Tosh Con Lodged 14 Jun 2000

The question

To ask the Scottish Executive how many requests from local authorities to dispose of land or property at less than full market value it has refused since 1 July 1999, broken down by local authority, and how many of these requests related to (a) land and (b) property.

The answer

Answered by Wendy Alexander on 13 Jul 2000 · 29 days after it was lodged, 15 days after it was due

Section 74(2) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 ensures that council tax payers obtain value for their assets, affords a measure of protection to the authority against charges of discrimination between purchasers and precludes the award of hidden subsidies. Our usual policy has been to grant applications for dispensation under section 74(2) if the intending buyer or lessee is performing some kind of charitable or public service function and where it could reasonably be argued that the buyer could not afford the full market price.Under this section 2 requests have been turned down. These are:North Lanarkshire council requested consent to dispose of a former play area at Roman Road, Motherwell to the Roman Road Gospel Hall (RRGH) at less than market value. The council stated that RRGH had informed them that the public benefit gained from the proposal would be that the cars currently parked on Roman Road would be removed to the car park. We felt that this did not justify selling a public asset at less than full market value. The council also stated in their original application that the reason the council were selling the land to the Gospel Hall was to allow them to expand their facilities. In later correspondence it was confirmed that the Gospel Hall had since indicated to the council by letter that they have no intention to expand, thus rendering the councils original reason for selling the land to RRGH redundant. Consent was refused on 16 May 2000.
Orkney Islands council requested consent to dispose of land to the executors of a Mr Cecil Copland at less than market value. This was due to the original sale to Mr Copland, in 1977, not going ahead because of an oversight by the council. Since 1977 Mr Copland had been using the land. When he died his executors stated that although the payment had not gone through the land belonged to Mr Copland and only the originally agreed price would need to be paid. Because of the period of time the price of the land had risen so selling at the original price would need section 74 consent. We asked the council what public benefit would be gained from this sale and they replied by stating that they could not see any public benefit in selling the land to the above parties. Although the case was an unusual one we could not grant consent to dispose of a public asset if there was no clear benefit to the public. The fault lay with both parties in that each failed to pursue the sale to its proper conclusion. Consent was refused on 22 May 2000.
These are the only applications refused consent under section 74 since 1 July 1999.Requests for consent to dispose of land at less than best price are considered under section 74(2) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. In addition, if the land is held on the Housing Revenue Account (HRA), consent in terms of section 12(7) of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 will also be required.Requests for consent to dispose of housing held on the Housing Revenue Account at less than best price are considered under section 12(7) of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 (section 12(10) disapplies section 74(2) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973).No requests have been turned down under section 12(7) since 1 July 1999.

In the Official Report

No contribution in the Official Report cites S1W-07980 by reference.