Motion For Debate · S6M-16171 · Session 6
Ensuring that Communities are at the Heart of the Electricity Consenting Process
The motion
That the Parliament opposes the UK and Scottish governments’ jointly proposed reforms to the consenting process under the Electricity Act 1989, which risk silencing the voices of communities by removing the right to a public inquiry on consent decisions; notes with concern that the Scottish Government has allowed pylons and other electricity infrastructure to be built without the consent of local communities; acknowledges that community groups often do not have the resources to oppose electricity infrastructure, and calls on the Scottish Government to consider how this could be addressed, and implores both governments to abandon these plans and to ensure that community voices are at the heart of the consenting process going forward.
What MSPs voted on: the motion as amended
The Conservatives’ motion was rewritten by an SNP amendment (S6M-16171.3) before this vote. A vote ‘for’ was a vote for the SNP’s wording.
110 words removed by S6M-16171.3
Final wording as read into the Official Report at Decision Time. The marked changes are worked out by this site from the amendment texts and match that wording.
Amendments
- S6M-16171.3 SNP Dr Alasdair Allan Agreed vote, 63–55
- S6M-16171.1 Labour Sarah Boyack Fell per the Official Report
- S6M-16171.2 Liberal Democrat Liam McArthur Fell per the Official Report
Vote
1 division- 22 Jan 2025Carried83 for, 35 against, 7 abstained
Amendments
3-
No recorded vote
-
No recorded vote
Supporters
No MSP has added their name to this motion.
In the Official Report
4 contributions mention S6M-16171-
22 Jan 2025Electricity Infrastructure Consenting
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-16171, in the name of Douglas Lumsden, on ensuring that communities are at the heart of the electricity consenting process. I invite members who wish to speak in the debate to press their…
-
22 Jan 2025Decision Time
I remind members that if the amendment in the name of Alasdair Allan is agreed to, the amendments in the name of Sarah Boyack and Liam McArthur will fall. The next question is, that amendment S6M-16171.3, in the name of Alasdair Allan, whi…
-
22 Jan 2025Decision Time
The question is, that motion S6M-16171, in the name of Douglas Lumsden, on ensuring that communities are at the heart of the electricity consenting process, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
-
22 Jan 2025Decision Time
The result of the division on motion S6M-16171, in the name of Douglas Lumsden, on ensuring that communities are at the heart of the electricity consenting process, as amended, is: For 83, Against 35, Abstentions 7. Motion, as amended, agr…