Members' Business Motion · S6M-09705 · Session 6
Fire Service Cuts
The motion
That the Parliament notes, with concern, reports that the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) has ordered the temporary withdrawal of fire appliances at 10 stations across Scotland, including Greenock Community Fire Station in the West Scotland region; understands that the Fire Brigades Union has expressed deep concern that this reduction will risk the safety of both firefighters and the wider public; further understands that the SFRS is expected to receive a flat cash budget settlement from the Scottish Government over the next four years, and that the service claims it must make £36 million in cuts as a result; believes that this follows a decade of cuts, the reported loss of 1,100 firefighter jobs, and, it understands, a 14% increase in average response times per incident; notes SFRS Chief Officer Ross Haggart’s comments that there is also a £630 million backlog in the service's capital investment; further notes reported freedom of information (FOI) findings that 75% of buildings in Scotland’s fire estate are assessed as being of "bad" or "poor" suitability, and that around 45% are assessed as being in either "bad" or "poor" condition; believes that the combination of withdrawn appliances and what it sees as a dilapidated fire estate puts firefighters, who are exposed to health risks from encountering dangerous fire contaminants in their job, at further risk; further believes that firefighters work hard to ensure the safety of people in Scotland's communities; notes the view that firefighters deserve to be well-equipped, well-resourced, well-protected and well-paid to do the job that they do, and further notes calls for the Scottish Government to come forward with emergency funding for both day-to-day spend and capital budgets, in order to prevent further cuts to staff and equipment, and to modernise the fire estate.
Signatures by party
15 MSPs besides the lodger · 3 from other partiesParty on the day each MSP signed. Signing a motion is voluntary and not whipped. Who signs whose motions
Vote
No recorded vote on this motion. Most motions are never debated, and many that are debated are agreed without a division. Vote records are published from 2011.
Supporters
15 MSPsLab 12 Green 2 Con 1
Show all 15 supporters by party
Lab 12
- Claire Baker
- Neil Bibby
- Foysol Choudhury
- Pam Duncan-Glancy
- Rhoda Grant
- Mark Griffin
- Monica Lennon
- Richard Leonard
- Pauline McNeill
- Alex Rowley
- Paul Sweeney
- Mercedes Villalba
Green 2
Con 1
Party shown is each supporter’s party when the motion was published.
In the Official Report
1 contribution mention S6M-09705-
31 Oct 2023Fire Service
The final item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-09705, in the name of Katy Clark, on fire service cuts. The debate will be concluded without any question being put. Motion debated, That the Parliament notes, with con…