Motion For Debate · S4M-06658 · Session 4
Ferry Services
The motion
That the Parliament believes that the Scottish Government needs to take action to address a number of failings in its policy on ferries; calls on it to provide a detailed response to the report that it commissioned on the effect of the removal of road equivalent tariff from commercial vehicles, which found that this has had a detrimental impact on hauliers and island communities; further calls on ministers to outline what financial penalties have been levied on Serco following its failure to run the Stromness to Scrabster service because of a mechanical failure to MV Hamnavoe and what action is being taken to ensure that this service is not disrupted in the future; expresses concern that Caledonian MacBrayne’s proposals could see many port staff receive pay cuts of up to 25%, and believes that the Scottish Government should make clear in a statement that it does not believe that this publicly owned company should proceed with these proposals.
What MSPs voted on: the motion as amended
Labour’s motion was rewritten by an SNP amendment (S4M-06658.2) before this vote. A vote ‘for’ was a vote for the SNP’s wording.
155 words removed by S4M-06658.2
Final wording as read into the Official Report at Decision Time. The marked changes are worked out by this site from the amendment texts and match that wording.
Amendments
- S4M-06658.1 Liberal Democrat Liam McArthur Fell per the Official Report
- S4M-06658.2 SNP Keith Brown Agreed vote, 65–48
Signatures by party
1 MSP besides the lodger · 0 from other partiesParty on the day each MSP signed. Signing a motion is voluntary and not whipped. Who signs whose motions
Vote
1 division- 22 May 2013Carried65 for, 48 against, 1 abstained
Amendments
2-
No recorded vote
Supporters
1 MSPLab 1
Party shown is each supporter’s party when the motion was published.
In the Official Report
3 contributions mention S4M-06658-
22 May 2013Ferry Services
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-06658, in the name of Richard Baker, on ferry services. I inform members that timing is extremely tight, so any interventions must be taken in members’ own time. If members could take sli…
-
22 May 2013Decision Time
The next question is, that amendment S4M-06658.2, in the name of Keith Brown, which seeks to amend motion S4M-06658, in the name of Richard Baker, on ferry services, be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
-
22 May 2013Decision Time
Therefore, the real amendment in the name of Liam McArthur falls.The next question is, that motion S4M-06658, in the name of Richard Baker, on ferry services, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.