Petition · PE01688 · Session 5
Permitted development rights in conservation areas
Signatures
0
Comments
12
Considered
3 meetings
What it asks
Calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review the permitted development rights legislation, which we consider impacts unfairly on residents of conservation areas and listed buildings in Scotland.
What the petitioner did first
We have contacted Rona Mackay MSP and our regional MSPs.
We have tried talking to our Local Authority Planning Department but their hands are tied by this legislation.
We have consulted our Local Councillors.
We have consulted the Planning Advice Service who have said that everything in our petition is correct.
We have tried talking to our Local Authority Planning Department but their hands are tied by this legislation.
We have consulted our Local Councillors.
We have consulted the Planning Advice Service who have said that everything in our petition is correct.
Where it was considered
Official Report-
24 May 20181 mention
-
5 Sep 20191 mention
-
20 Feb 20201 mention
Signatures by country
58 online signaturesComments
12 comments, oldest first-
Susan Reilly 28 Mar 2018This would actually help residents look after their homes as opposed to being worried about doing the slightest improvement, alteration or renovation and being charged £200 a time.
-
Susan Reilly 28 Mar 2018This is a truly unnecessary cost for residents who simply want to look after and improve their property.
-
Sandy Welsh 28 Mar 2018What is fair for one should be fair for all in a democracy.
-
Liam Mason 28 Mar 2018To quote a local authority planning dept on developments within a conservation area: "it's better to ask forgiveness than permission". If that's the reality, then the rules are broken.
-
Dr. Keith N. Stewart 30 Mar 2018It would be very unfair to have a planning application fee for a Listed Building or a Building within a Conservation Area. As a B-listed building owner I am very aware of the substantially higher costs of maintaining a Listed building. I am particularly concern that if such a fee were applied to those within a Conservation Area this would only lead to developments, improvements and maintenance that would simply be carried out without any reference to the Local planning department. The number of conservation areas that have been completely compromised by such an approach is sadly all too common in Scotland. Built Heritage in my view is seen as a low priority within Local Authorities'
- if that planning fee was to have a positive effect on improving built heritage it may have some merit. Sadly I fear that the introduction of such a fee would make no difference to the inadequate resourcing of Built Heritage at the local level. -
Roger Boyle 30 Mar 2018A consultation with planning with verbal approval fooled by an email confirming it.
-
Joan Coverley 30 Mar 2018I live in a conservation village on the Moray Coast. I had my house painted last year, no change to colours or anything, but I wasn't even aware that I should have applied to the LA to do this, and pay £202 for the privilege of maintaining the property. Since ignorance of the law is seemingly no excuse but lots of people must be unwittingly breaking the law, then it is not good law.
-
Derek Smith 2 Apr 2018Residents of the garden suburb should not have to pay for planning permission to make small changes to their properties.This is an outdated and unfair practice.
-
James Williamson 2 Apr 2018To deny or charge a householder from say a patio or shed or a decking area or a small summer house is surely an infringement of their equal rights. Furthermore the only way this would be enforced is to rely on neighbours reporting each other to their local authority
-
Michael Paterson 4 Apr 2018Agree with the rationale of the request
-
Michael Paterson 4 Apr 2018As a member of the committee I agree with the rationale of the wording of the Petion
-
Louise Hunter 8 Apr 2018Very unfair